After the methodological aspects of the dialectical triad of truth, trust, love were interpreted in the previous creative article, the very important is to emphasize that this dialectical content is differently handled in variuos cultural dia religious contexts and environments, especially, when reconsidered from the perspective of the distinction between good and evil (choices, ways...). For example, in the Judaeo-Christian understanding of the distinguishing good from evil, the act of murdering of a person is a much greater committed evil (higher ranked commandment) compared to the act of adultery (much lower ranked commandment). In spite of this, they rather raise their voices when the adultery was committed than when other forms of evil and harm to others [to good persons, on the first place] were inflicted and committed [violation of the much higher ranked nine commandments: resulting with turning commandments value upside-down]. Although, neo-secularists of the modern western-oriented societies

• The concept of neo-secularism in difference to secularism is not about the separation of the state from the religion institutions but actually a new emerged religion, based on the modern interpretation and improvement of the basic ideas of paganism of the disintegrated Roman Empire, and which as such one is embedded and fused with establishes state apparatus, (semi-)state and private institutions and organisations..... In this mean way was created an invisible wall, which prevents everyone to penetrate their institutions and organisations because everything is under full surveillance and control. Even getting a job of doing hard manual work or a hazardous work to personal safety is feasible only if they dia "them" allow this and so long as they are ready to tolerate it. In short, their goal is transformation of all believers into modern heathens, not only domestically but internationally: formation of the united states of modern pagans (everywhere).
• In this latest established big religion, the use of religious symbols is formally permitted and tolerated [wearing cross (as a decorative jewellery), circumcision (as a formality), transformation of temples of God into museums, accommodation and hotels....; false humanism by formally abolishing death penalty but not the death as a result of the softly killing in the silence of neo-secularism and natiocratism [ debtism: leading to pour nourishment, hunger.... softly killing: death]; more taking care about animals than people, encouraging spending time (DIA space: spirit, mind dia reason, matter) in various manifestations of the parallel universes as their way of understanding, emulation, and substitute of the life in paradise [by using drugs, virtual universes of the internet social networks, propagandistic fusser-movies and reality shows for entertainment and a continual generation of simple-minded and vulgar people, as well as other ways of favouring committing evil (choices) at the expense of the good (paths) ....].
• In short, all this is used for an easier achievement of their modern heathen goals, the purpose of which is a further discrediting and ruining the reputation of God's religions. Behind their hidden scenery and in the background of all these afore-mentioned obscured actions and dark activities, their numerous secret services, both state and private ones, as well as secret organizations, by penetrating the so-called deep state and private organizations and institutions, carry out a ruthless persecution of those who do not share these religious ideas of theirs, or have a different opinion (this creator of knowledge, for example) in spite of the (FORMALLY AGAIN) proclaimed freedom of speech and creative acting, apart from enjoying these freedoms of theirs in various manifestations of the "Hide Parks", but not in their neo-secular institutions (universities, for example) and (semi-)state apparatus.
• As far the notion-love, which is in focus of this creative article, according to them, love is everywhere around you, surrounding you from all sides. The concept of truth is also offered in this modernly-heathen way, that is, there are so many of it as there are earthly gods in a social environment (hierarchically arranged). Trust, understood in terms of the total and absolute loyalty and obedience, is a must in these modernly-paganic political systems of the rule of natiocracy. Vow, what a nice life when surrounded with so much of love, freedom and other buzzy-words of theirs! In my opinion, in the societies where love and freedom is truly present, its (humane) inhabitants would choose to enjoy their fruits instead of too loudly talking about it, similarly to an impotent ex-Casanova, who constantly talks about making love instead of doing it.
• Either way, as a result of this manifestation of natiocratic utopia, where this creator of knowledge creatively acted, according to the speakers of the neo-secularism, he was surrounded by the (christian love of) hundred millions of (devoted) Christians, millions followers of other God's religion!? But this arises logical questions: why then, his ideas were greeted by the sword and confrontation, persecution, treating him as an unwelcome intruder.... In short, the citation of the emissaries and prophets of God by implementing their quotes in creative purposes, particularly, the citation of the words of Christ because the true Christianity, based on the words of Christ, has been already wiped out and replaced by the afore-mentioned modernly-heathen interpretation of christianity on these expanses: Neo-secularism. In other words, the creative acting and these implementad contra-actions of this creator of knowledge are a barrier to a further carrying out of these neo-secular ideas of theirs (Matthew-7:1-5).
• On the other hand, to properly function this political natiocratic system of the established neo-secular religion, all traces of the emissary of God acting (Holy Books and Scriptures) has to be wiped out. In other words, made busy with the 'enjoying' the first 'sweet' fruits of making fun with this person from the distant 'backward past', they failed to eliminate me from this creative scene at the right time. In short, these powerful and mighty 'cowards' [one person against all them mighty ones], in spite of boasting with their top universities, 'modern temples of their full-time employed priests', who can not yield a high-valued creative answer to the creative content contained in my creative works, written periodically by only one person, when not spending his time (prison sentence) DIA the appropriate creative space in the modern gulags of theirs [doing hard manual work there] but in their natiocratically created dungeon of the open type. Here the word goes about a Meany natiocratic combination of the spending time inside this prison (a dorm for sleeping) and out of it (creatively working, for example).
• In spite of all this, this heavenly creator of knowledge, acting inside me, actually makes fun of them [at the expense of sacrificing the earthly manifestation of him: again on "my" account] all by drawing slowly His net around them. For more information in connection with the "the TIME VALUE (THOUSANDS OF YEARS)" of the words of these Great Individuals from this distant past, read the creative article: PECULIARITIES OF THE DIALECTICAL INTERACTIVE APPROACH.
• In short, these powerful and mighty 'cowards' [one person against all them mighty ones], in spite of boasting with their top universities, 'modern temples of their full-time employed priests', who can not yield a high-valued creative answer to the creative content contained in my creative works, written periodically by only one person, when not spending his time (prison sentence) DIA the appropriate creative space in the modern gulags of theirs [doing hard manual work there] but in their natiocratically created dungeon of the open type. Here the word goes about a Meany natiocratic combination of the spending time inside this prison (a dorm for sleeping) and out of it (creatively working, for example).
• All this is at my expense including paying taxes when working to finance their persecution of me, and then, spending the rest of the earned money for "life in their dorms for eating and sleeping" [no visible prison guardians apart from the hidden ones, that is, I personally close the door behind me for gratis, each time after entering within it].
• In spite of all this, this heavenly creator of knowledge, acting inside me, actually makes fun of them all [at the expense of sacrificing the earthly manifestation of him: again on "my" account] while the net of Heavenly forces is slowly drawn around them. For more information in connection with the "the TIME VALUE (THOUSANDS OF YEARS)" of the words of these Great Individuals from this distant past, read the creative article: PECULIARITIES OF THE DIALECTICAL INTERACTIVE APPROACH.

argue that they better handle the afore-mentioned dialectical content, they also continue to spread other much more harmful ways of the inflicting and committing evil to others, both domestically and internationally. Is it a coincidence?

Now, after this broader dialectical framework for dealing with this complex dialectical concept of the triad of truth, trust, and love was developed, you are ready to follow the dialectical interpretation of this triad in connection with the concept of earthly understanding the concept of "absolute truth". In other words, this dialectical contents will be reinterpreted from the viewpoint of the highest level of conceiving, comprehending and understanding of this complex dialectical triad: In short, the source of this kind of the truth is in God

• "The lamp of the Lord searches the Inner Being of a (wo)man; it searches out her, his Inmost Being" (Proverbs-20:27); In the Christian terminology, "this Lamp" is better known as the Holy Spirit,

and for this reason, seen from this divine perspective, a human being should not lie her-, himself by trying to deceive this "lamp" while searching her, his inner being, understood in terms of the (changed) colour of its inmost light, that is in the sense: no one knows, and saw this; (s)he cannot trust NOBODY ELSE more than to the God, as well as (s)he cannot love anyone else more than God loves her, him, understood in terms of the embedded love of His into her, his inner being, because this source of the feasible capability of true loving someone (else) has already been contained inside her, his inner being DIA the inmost one (her, his kingdom). Read also, Matthew-22:37-40. These complex interrelations between and among the truth, trust and love will be manifested in the living reality during each kind of interaction of these three constituent dialects of the dialectical triad. For example, during the building and establishment of a (true and genuine humane) personal relationship. READ, "The Concept of the Living God".

By the way, this topic was also thoroughly explained and elaborated in the previous creative article. Recall thyself, the only retained (and unsolved) dual dilemma within the presented dialectical interactive approach is the dialectical concept of distinguishing GOOD from evil. And this dilemma is much more important than the concept of truth, trust, or love, or any other notion. On the other hand, on the human level, this dialectical content of the distinguishing GOOD from evil can be resolved in the sense, what is better from the available, accessible choices, ways, ..., accordingly deduced in utmost terms, WHAT IS LESS or the LEAST EVIL in a concrete scenario in time DIA situation in space. In short, seen from this dialectical approach of dealing with the very complex inter-relations between truth, trust, and love, what is the benefit from the truth if the final result of this one-sided approach will bring more evil (than good) in a considered societal and cultural context.

Most people will be faced with the TRUE consequences of the dialect-truth [the recognisable human prick (pangs) of CONSCIENCE] only after an unwished scenario in time DIA appropriate situation in space took place, that is, with the final outcome of the dialectical interplay of truth and love, mediated by the (misused) trust. In other words, sooner or later, (s)he will be confronted with the question "did (s)he truly love the victim(s) of the implemented (earthly) dual or binary way of understanding the notion-truth". In this context, the so called white and sweet lies too ("You are the most beautiful woman in the world") should be excluded while dealing with challenges of the truth because such and similar statements does not make harm to anyone (no committed evil). In this context too, the true meaning and role of the dialect - trust can be easier figured out, which in fact mediates between the dialects-truth and love while dealing with very complex relations of this dialectical triad, as it was also thoroughly elaborated in the previous creative article. In other words, in the scenario in time DIA the appropriate situation in space, when dialect-trust was misused or abused

• [third commandment: "you shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God", accordingly the source of the truth, trust and love embedded inside thy inner DIA inmost being]

in a relationship between (two) persons in the behalf of a solo-meaning the truth (or love), for example, an entrusted secret. In any case, regardless which of these three closely interrelated dialects was wrongly used (or abused) at the expense of other two, the final result will be a disturbed or ruined balance between and among the dialects truth, trust and love, that is, the final outcome of it will finish with a more or less bad or evil scenario in time DIA the appropriate situation in space.

In the opinion of this creator of knowledge, by dialectically synthesizing all aforementioned related to the dialect-LOVE, it might be argued that you can truly and GENUINELY love someone else, only in the extent which is in accordance with how much of the aforementioned love (of God) IS CONTAINED DIA PRESERVED inside thy inner being DIA INMOST ONE, as well as someone can truly and GENUINELY be loved by someone else in accordance with it! After uttering such and similar statements in the life reality, it is to be expected that this will be contradicted with the generally accepted ways and patterns of the EARTHLY thinking, based on the previously mentioned mob DIA group way of thinking, that you can't love anyone anymore than your children, mother, wife, .... or to be more loved by someone else than you are loved by (any of) them. Is that really so, even when it comes to the IDEAL (earthly) family, including the case if the (harmful) influences of happenings in the broader social context were ignored, but something with which always has to be counted in the life reality?

First of all, many of us, and the prophets and emissaries of God in particular, were separated in a shorter or longer period from this direct manifestation of the family love, substituting it with the indirect way of expressing love, or with the various manifestations of the modern (ITC) "love", if you so please. In addition to this, sooner or later, any of us will leave DIA be left by these charming exponents of love or lovers, both in earthly terms of the understanding of love

• [children will leave their parents in order to (HOPEFULY) love even more someone else, [his wife, her husband and their children, or perhaps leaving them too in order to love even more her, his mistress....; or simply the death will separate each of us from the loved persons],

or in the heavenly sense,

• with the departure of the emissaries of God to accomplish their special missions, for example].

In short, seen from this broadest perspective, the love of God is the MOST APPROPRIATE ONE, as well as the most needed and necessary, when dealing with various situations in space DIA the appropriate scenario in time especially, if they are of evil character and nature. On the other hand, when handling challenges of the earthly (way of) understanding the notion-love, it might be argued, this dialectical content could be expanded in the earthly sense that you cannot more love anyone else than thyself because as it was previously expounded the real source of love (the God;s love) is contaned in thy inner being. Here it was not meant on the so-called egoistic, narcissistic, ..., love, but on the love understood in the previously interpreted way, based on the individual way of thinking, which has its source in (the cleanness of) thy inner DIA inmost being (thy kingdom), and which thy real master already has been occupied and does his work (Job-26:4) including the issues of love! This statement can be elaborated in the best way by dialectically reconsidering the generally accepted interpretation of the greatest love in the earthly sense: the love of a mother to her child(ren), or the love of grandmother, or the love of the (grand)father, if you so please, because this dialectical interactive content is both individually and culturally affected and dependent on it.

Before the further dialectical elaboration of this statement continues, pay your attention that in the life reality it is very difficult to establish and agree, whose love is the greatest one in the earthly sense, even if this was considered within the (concept of an) IDEAL family. Keep in mind, this kind of the warm family love is not always present in the living reality, from various reasons. Note too, that here, the two-way relation(ship), or a dialectical relationship uttered in terms of thesis, antithesis and synthesis DIA THE RENEWED THESIS, ...., in this particular case, was deduced to the one-way relationship, because it is even more difficult to establish in TIME DIA SPACE, whom the child will love more in the future: her, his mother, wife/husband, without to mention the love towards her, his (grand)children and so on. In other words, earthly love is CHANGEABLE in time DIA space. Note too, during this creative consideration, the dialect-love was also taken out of the corresponding dialectical triad (truth, trust, love). If to this was added the well-known dilemma, which child the mother loves the most, as well as will love in future, I hope, you figured out the all complexity of this dialectical content under creative consideration in spite of the considerable simplification of it: ONE-WAY approach.

By the way said, my mother loved me the most, although, for example, my sister was younger than me [usually the youngest child is loved the most], as well as so was within the broader family [for sure, before choosing this thornly pathway of the creator of knowledge]. Frankly said, in those time DIA space, this creator of knowledge neither was able to conceive, nor to understand, why this was so, nor he personally had need for such a privilege. Now, he is able to figure out the hidden meaning of this dialectical content. In short, inside this creator of knowledge DIA our common Inner Beings, mediated by the invisible but sensible spirit of God, the most (hidden) light was contained: God's love, which later enabled this creator of knowledge to note down this creative works of his. On the other hand, by looking back DIA forward in time DIA space, my mother (unconsciously) supported this inborn (cap)ability of mine by pouring even more (her) love into my Inner Being DIA Inmost being. Or perhaps, she intuitively felt that much later, in the second stage of my life DIA living, this creator of knowledge will have greater need for it compared to his sister and brothers.

No doubt that this extra 'inhaled' love by my mother and other members of my family also helped this creator of knowledge to survive so many years of the creative acting by struggling to survive in such an INHUMAN environment, such as the EU-NATO security zone. Keep in mind, these EVIL-DOERS, not only inflicted me a lot of harm and evil but also considerably contributed to the death of my mother in the fate-year 2000. Although in those time DIA space, I tried to hide these facts from my mother and other members of the family, my mother intuitively felt it. This also proves that no one can cheat the heart of a mother. Of course, later (2004) I revealed the truth to other members of my family. After a typical family-like "hot" conversation, my INDIVIDUAL choice finally was accepted, or since then this theme has been avoided during conversation with them, if you so please. Anyway, this creator of knowledge would never stop with accomplishing the life mission of his, no matter who demanded DIA did beg for it, nor this would solve his personal problems with the persecutors of his.

On the other hand, each great individual or emissary of God will never involve in accomplishment of her, his life-mission anyone whom (s)he loves, including her, his friends [pulling them together in 'grave': is that love?]. Particularly, WHEN (s)he is fully aware of the fact that such an inhuman involvement will not at all contribute to the quicker carrying out of her, his life mission, nor they can help you in (this creative) fight for survival against such powerful anf mighty enemies of mine and God's too. Keep in mind, this is the most mighty military, militant, political, economic, .... POWER. On the silly question of various omniscient persons and counsellors, why I didn't keep silent as it all others do but chose this self-destructing life-path, my response has always been that I am not "all others" but a great individual of His, and exactly chose this "self-destructing life-path" because none of you wanted to do it. On top of it, you shed crocodile tears for the fate or destiny of mine. Simply someone had to do it, as it has always been throughout the recorded history of humankind and mankind. By the way said, this creator of knowledge also didn't ask or request from anyone else to agree with the uttered ideas and thoughts in the creative works of his because this violates the basic postulate of the dialectic interactive approch.

• On the main page of the internet portal boboraz.com was clearly emphasized: "This person, who developed Dialectic Interactive Approach, doesn't expect from you to agree with the exposed ideas and thoughts, but if you want to read something other, which is different from the existing, ideologically deeply imprinted thought patterns, then do not miss this opportunity....."

My mother died at the end of year 2000, never seeing her son. In spite of this great loss, this creator of knowledge, as any true follower of God have continued with the accomplishment of his life mission, by going there, where God told him to go, and not there where anyone else wanted to go, something like the ancient Abraham or Joseph did "by going in Egypt or returning from Egypt back". This was the only way to survive long enough in order to as faster as feasible to accomplish this VERY difficult special (life-) mission.

On the other hand, seen from the perspective of the truth, trust, and love of God, for reconsideration and rethinking are some interpretations related to the well-known "story", how Abraham needed to sacrifice his only son on the REQUEST of God (!?), that is, the understanding of this dialectos of parables in the litteral sense:

• Some time later God tested Abraham. He said to him, "Abraham!" "Here I am," he replied. Then God said, "Take your son, your ONLY SON, Isaac, whom you love, and go the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains I will tell you about." .... Isaac spoke up and said to his farther Abraham, "Farther?" "Yes, my son?" Abraham replied. "The fire and wood are here," Issac said, "but where is the lamb for the burnt offering?" Abraham answered, "God himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering!" .... Then he reached out his hand and took the knife to slay his son. But the ANGEL of the LORD called out to him from heaven, "Abraham! Abraham!" Here I am, he replied. "Do not lay a hand on the boy", he said. "Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear of God, because you have not withheld from me your son, YOUR ONLY SON!" .... (Moses-Genesis, 22.1-19).

First of all, the happenings and described events of the Holy Book and Scripture cannot be read as a simple newspaper's story because no mouth of God writes the stories, nor uses this form of literal expression, but rather notes down this in the form of a DIALECTOS of parables. In short, God would never request such a kind of sacrifice from any of his emissaries, especially not in this particular case because the life mission of Abraham was to have descendants. By the way, God has no need for such kind of testing (read again content of the Proverbs-20:27). On the other hand, during accomplishment of the life-mission, after confrontation and conflict with the well-known narrow-minded interests of the "princes of the earth of old", each emissary of God will FOR SURE, sooner or later, come in such a difficult, or hopeless situation in space DIA the appropriate scenario in time, that is, to SACRIFICE something valuable for her, him, including the most precious one. By the way, this dialectical content under consideration is not at all unknown to the majority of actors of the Holy Books and Scriptures. As an example, read the "Book of Job", that is,

• how God has wronged Job and drawn His net around him (Job-19:6), humiliated him, blocked his way so that he cannot pass, stripped him of honour, removed the crown from his head, uprooted his hope, counted him among His enemies, encamped with His troops his tent ....
• Or how God had alienated his brothers from him, .. acquaintances, .. kinsmen, .. friends, .. guests, .. maidservants, .. servants, .... wife, .... even little boys, .. intimate friends .... "I am nothing but skin and bones; I have escaped by only the skin of my teeth" (Job-19:1-20). According to Job, God has done this all, respectively, as it Job previously put himself in dilemma: "If it is not He, then who is it?" (Job-9:21-24).

In short, by bringing to end this dia-process, each emissary of God, while acting in an inhuman environment, where dominates evil and rule various kinds of evil-doers and villains, will be COMPELLED BY THEM (international dark network: earthly 'gods') to sacrifice something, that is, 'TO BE TESTED' by them, and not by God. In short, why God should put an emissary of His on such a godless test, for example, to check the suspicious activity of the sent emissary of His, when He can simply verify this by using His (Holy) Spirit to check with this lamp the colour of the inner being of the emissary of His: her, his inmost light, the kingdom of the master, (s)he serves: "The lamp of the Lord searches the Inner Being of a (wo)man; it searches out her, his Inmost Being" (Proverbs-20:27). In short, Abraham, from one or another reason, during the accomplishment of his VERY difficult life mission of bringing forth child(ren) with human root in this part of the Earth, came in such a difficult situation, when around him there was no visible way out of it. Paraphrasing Moses, Abraham in such a hopeless situation looked up in heaven, and from there came help, in one or another way ...

In addition to this, Moses wanted to convey to the (Great) prophets and (special) emissaries of God, who will come after Him, that they should trust in God and helpers of His. There is no doubt that the true purpose of the original text of this dialectos of parables, whose traces had been deeply imprinted in (the medium of) time DIA space, and for this reason, this dialectos is still readable in now-days, was to emphasize the difficulty of carrying out the life-mission of Abraham. But over the passage of time DIA space, by (ORAL) narrators (from generation to generation) this original text was changed and adapted in terms of a typical earthly way of the simple-minded thinking of people, that is, the dirty role of the omnipresent 'mighty' earthly gods and various trouble-makers was substituted and attributed to the Heavenly God and Angel, in order to be easier understood and conjured up the messages of this complicated dialectos od parables to as many people as possible. By the way, it has always been much easier to blame God and Angels far away in the heavens [to howl and bark at God, or at Cosmos] than the earthly gods (omni-)present here on earth. Either way, this deeply rooted earthly way of understanding (the concept of) God had been also present on the earthly space and time of acting of the Great Prophet Moses

• [as well as in now-days has been changed nothing in regard to these underdeveloped spiritual dia mindual capabilities of people in large],

and can be traced by reading the happenings described in the narration "The Golden Calf" (2.Moses-32). Keep in mind, the life-mission of emissaries of God can not be accomplished, if they, AFTER BEING TRANSFIGURED, would have continued with thinking in this very narrow-minded EARTHLY way, as well as if they allowed to being blackmailed with earthly gods.

• "The Spirit of the Lord will come upon thee in all His power, and thou will prophesy with them; and thou will be transfigured into a different person. Once these signs are fulfilled, do whatever thy hand finds to do, for God is with thee" (1.Samuel-10:6-7). Read also John-16:5-16.

For this reason, losses and various kinds of (material) sacrifice are an unavoidable part of their mission. Like in a chess-play, full of tactical and strategic moves including the sacrificing available chess pieces, in a hopeless situation in the available space for the creative acting DIA the appropriate scenario in time, you have to be ready to risk everything including your head [if you "die" (lose this game), try it next time again, if you want it] and perhaps to win (to accomplish your life-mission), or to accept devil's offer at the price to stay in that evil world forever (by selling your soul: the life of constant down, down.... and perhaps up if you deserve it). Material losses are for sure the least price to pay in order to accomplish thy life-mission. Keep in mind, this is not up to you. Simply you will not have other good options and alternatives for sure.

By the way, because this is the price to pay for all these losses and worth of it (Job-22:21-30); do you know any prophet or emissary of God who managed to accomplish the life-mission without suffering various kinds of losses and sacrifices? As an example, this creator of knowledge knows very well, what he was capable of creatively achieving before he was transfigured into a creator of knowledge: the Netmodal Management Model, the first business model for following dynamic aspects of the business (virtual internet) reality [but a creative achievement, which is still in the shallow waters of the simple-minded thinking], AND WHAT AFTER THAT. By the way, each emissary of God also knows, God will compensate their losses, in one or another way. Recall, the God is only true LIFE-GIVER, understood in terms of eternity DIA infinity, what is not the case with their master(s) and their followers, who are completely dependable on the uncertain destiny or fate of their offspring (similarly, to other living creatures). On the other hand, if you are honest, most of you are even not ready to rise and bring up appropriate bodies (spiritual frameworks), as it Abraham did [succeeding this in such difficult conditions and circumstances] in order to be born there such a capable spiritual humane being, understood in terms of being able later, on the first place, to recollect what is her, his further life mission.

As far the dialectos of parables, this way of expression was used throughout the Holy Bible (both in the Old Testament and New Testament). As an example of it, Christ addressed the disciples of His:

• "The knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of God has been given to you, but to others I speak in parables, so that, 'though seeing, they may not see; though hearing, they may not understand'" (Luke-8:9-10, Matthew - 13:10-17).

On another occasion, after revealing secrets of the hidden knowledge to His disciples, "Christ, full of joy through the HOLY SPIRIT, said":

• “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven DIA earth(en), because you have hidden these things from the intelligent and learned, and revealed them to the little children. .... Then He turned to his disciples and said privately, “Blessed are the eyes that see what you see. For I tell you that many prophets and kings wanted to see what you see but did not see it, and to hear what you hear but did not hear it (Luke - 10:21-24).

By the way, this creator of knowledge revealed the methodological part of the hidden knowledge in his creative works to you again because a part of the secrets of the hidden knowledge revealed by Christ came into possession of secret societies [and not in the hands of the later established Christian church], was kept by them [note, they dia 'them' were also present and spied Christ too], and then this knowledge was lost in the coming turbulent times of the fall of old heathen civilizations. How this creator of knowledge managed to revive some secrets of the hidden knowledge in order to reveal them to you, read the following words of Christ to His disciples:

• “All this I have spoken while still with you. But the SPIRIT OF TRUTH of (the Everlasting) GOD, the Holy Spirit, whom the (Immortal God DIA) Father will send (in my name), will teach you all things and will REMIND YOU EVERYTHING I have taught you" (John - 14:25-27, John -16:7-8); NOTE, this aspect of the retrospective recollection.

Anyway, each dialectos of parables is written in such a way to give emissaries and followers of God (believers) hint (of the hidden) messages, which only they can understand, that is, what to do, what not should be done by them, understood in terms of distinguishing good from evil, with which scenarios in time DIA appropriate situations in space they might be faced and confronted, and so on. In other words, in a dialectos was embedded, imprinted, and compressed numerous dialectical interactively creative contents, on the basis of which, numerous stories, novels, movie scenarios and the like can be created. Or more simply said, if you still like stories, because a dialectos is too complicated and complex for your mindual faculties, then you can utter its dialectical content in terms of, for example, using this basic idea for writing a film scenario, that is, how a woman or man being in despair, not knowing what to do in order to be able to accomplish the assigned task, by seeing the wide-spread practice of sacrificing the firstborn son everywhere around her, him

• [cultivated by the offspring of the Abraham's brother Lot, ... old Phoenicians, ... Puns, as well as this ancient idea is implemented by the modern pagans in now-days, manifested in the form of sacrificing the future of their daughters and sons because they nothing learned from the past of their ancestors]

made decision to try to accomplish it with help of this evil practice. But earthly gods in such a scenario in time DIA this situation in space decided to send a 'caregiver' of theirs, to awake her, him from this illusionary dream, by (re)directeding her, him to do something else. For example, it is a better idea to take his child(ren) and wife or husband, and to go exile, or something like it .... This simple way of expression is perhaps a nice stuff for a film or novella, but not for a dialectos too.

Let me express this even more artistically, and which is still very actual in the present days. Similarly, as Abraham had nothing to put on the table in order to feed his only son, apart from slaying Isaac,

• as it did ALL other heathens around him by sacrificing their firstborn in religious purposes in order that their gods give them a good harvest,

the most valuable present of God in his old age, without which his life-mission cannot be accomplished; so his position was difficult, desperate and hopeless. Instead of doing this (EVIL), an Angel of God instructed him to break with this evil custom and tradition (doing GOOD) at the price of departure to Egypt, where he is not obliged of practicising this evil custom as well as to provide the food for his family, and in this way to save his son Isaac, the most precious to him in his old age: the full meaning (point) of his life-mission. This is how these events were seen from the earthly perspective. Or seen this from the heavenly perspective, God and His Angel managed to stop further sacrifices of the first-born because God does not need this kind of sacrifice [evil practice, hope you grasped, who need it] but .... (doing good). In short, in this theatrically dramatic way of the dialectical interplay between the emissary of His (Abraham: THESIS), who acted in this part of the Earth and the heavenly forces (God, Angel: ANTITHESIS), his son Isaac was saved (SYNTHESIS) as well as this evil practice was abandoned by the descendant of Isaac (DIA THIS RENEWED THESIS: the point of these dramatic events),

• The mission was successfully finished. Who knows how many emissaries of God were sent to accomplish this seemingly simple task, but failed because they simply could not figure out the sent messages, which can't be read by means of the five basic senses. By the way, the first attempts are the most difficult (not enough experience), but continual practice makes a master: get up ("resurrect") and then, try again it and gather points (LIGHT) in this way. Don't worry, God is the only life-giver! By the way said, the success of accomplishing the mission also depends on the distance, but not expressed in kilometers but in the sense to which extent the world is corrupted by evil (thy creative stage). As more the evil is embedded in thy creative stage as more difficult is to carry out thy (special) mission.

and as it was also recorded in this dialectos of parables, this happy-end led to the .... (RENEWED ANTITHESIS), and so on in time DIA space. Pay thy attention, how a small part of this dialectos (A BALL of TANGLED THREADS) unwinds, almost self-writing a novell by applying methodical procedures and techniques of the dialectic interactive approach. Now, compare Abraham's situation by trying to conjure up thyself how many children worldwide at this very moment are asking their fathers:

• "THE TABLE IS READY," his child said, "BUT WHERE IS THE PIECE OF BREAD FOR THE EATING?"

Bingo! Now this creator of knowledge hopes that you managed finally to grasp, the true meaning of a dialectos of parables, as well as to understand what is the true purpose of appearance of emissaries of God, here on the earth. In other words, all possible calamities on which each emissary of God has to count in each lower (EVIL) world, that is, to be ready to experience it on the own skin during the accomplishment of her, his life mission. Unfortunately, the setting table, but no food to put on it is something, what is still an everyday situation (HAPPENING) ALL OVER THE WORLD. In other words, the voices of these hungry children, for example, said in the vacuum and silence of darkness and obscurity of natiocratic societies here on the earth, are not heard and taken seriously because they are, for example, too busy with dancing on the various earthly-like "Titanics" and lulled up with their obscured music of the darkness!

Finishing the earlier initiated dialectical process, a few month after the death of my mother (year, 2000), this creator of knowledge, in spite of the measures undertaken by the (international) dark network finished the first true creative work of his: "Traces of Dialectics in Time DIA Space - Methodology for Creating Knowledge", Jovanovic, 2001. It might be argued, as a kind of conclusion, related to the love of a good parent towards her child, that an evil (grand)mother, (grand)father, .... will 'love' the evilest (vilest) child the most! Regardless of all this uttered regarding the close relationship with his mother, this creator of knowledge loved the most his grandfather (COLOURFULNESS OF LOVE). This fact was well known within the family, accepted DIA tolerated without being shown any kind of jealousy: For each normal parent DIA member of a family likes (LOVES) as well as is very proud when any of their children possesses this both human(e) and divine-like capability to love someone else too! Note, not the sense of its black-white counterpart: I love you if you love me, a clear sign of the lack of love in her, his inner being dia the inmost one in order to be able to share it.

As far another initiated but still not finished dialectical interactive process, by dialectically synthesising the all previously said, you have also perceived in the life reality or in watching films, perhaps not paid a lot of attention, to a typical everyday relationship, alternately (successively) played between a child and her, his mother. Seen from the mother's viewpoint that is in focus of this creative discussion, particularly, because this dialectical interactive content is also a constituent part of the concept of love, it can be easily observed how this fictional mother transits from a "good to the bad mother", seen and perceived from the child's perspective. She hugs and pets her, him, saying that she loves her, him the most in the whole world, ...., and later, in another situation, she transits to the opposite ("very bad") pole, to the opinion of the child). Although it might be argued that in the most cases she was in the right, understood in terms of the bringing up her child, you will perceive by careful observation that from time to time she came suddenly in a not human state from unexplainable reasons.

Here will be neglected the cases caused, as a consequence of the quarrelling with her husband, neighbour, chief ..., for example. In short, such dark moments are a result of the igniting by darkness (accumulated evil) the light (good) inside her inner being DIA inmost one (kingdom of ???), and then this kind of the inner darkened 'cocktail' is vented on others, including her child.

• The arrows of the Almighty are in me, my spirit drinks in their poison; God's terrors are marshaled against me (Job-6:4).

The written dialectical content which follows should be understood, as an attempt to be conjured up, how an innocent child was transformed later into an evil person (evil-doer). In short, it seems that this process of infusing the evil into the inner being of child starts with mother's nursing her, his child with this 'cocktail' of darkness. But this should be understood in terms of doing it from generation to generation. Also some other bad and evil practices (for example, Jeremiah-22:13) will be discussed in the rest of this creative article.

Keep in mind, that obscured darkness is contained in the "kingdom" of each earthly being. By the way said, you are also able to understand, why Christ had only one earthly parent (only mother), as well as why on the Last Day, the Day of JUDGEMENT, will have no EARTHLY parents. In other words, none of us, brought forth by two earthly beings, especially, in a world where prevails the evil, can claim that (s)he is (entirely) pure within her, his inner being DIA inmost one, but rather can argue, understood in terms of her, his capability of handling this dialectical interactive content BETTER in the most scenarios in time DIA appropriate situations in space in comparison to others. No doubt, it is very difficult to determine this manageable proportion between good and evil in the life reality, so when an evil person contains inside its kingdom 1% of good (light), this only means that (s)he is not 100% evil person. So how can this well-known issue of the everyday life be more impartially managed and self-controlled, because the greatest challenge is to be TO BE ACCEPTED this as a fact, in order (s)he would be ready to start with the cleaning and improvement of it?

In the opinion of this creator of knowledge, the best role models, understood in the earthly sense, are MAJOR actors of the Holy Books and Scriptures, who truly acted in this earthly environment, within which all the time DIA space (of the written history) has prevailed evil. Keep in mind, that any of them, including this creator of knowledge, in order to be able to prevail the dialectical distance between him on the earth and the invisible but sensible callers situated somewhere within the world of dialectics, (s)he has to possess the pure inner Being DIA the inmost one in such an extent, which is enough (allows her, him) to overcome this dialectical distance. As an example, this creator of knowledge can argue so much as he wants (empty babbling) that he was born as a good child, was a good person and the like, but this is only valid within the established criteria of what is good and what is evil in the course of time DIA appropriate space BEFORE he started with acting as the creator of knowledge, AND NOT AFTER IT! Simply this was not enough in order to act as the creator of knowledge. In other words, he started with cleaning and improving bandwidth of his kingdom in order to be capable of reading this invisible messages, the traces of which are imprinted in time DIA space, without previously wasting the precious time DIA space on arguing in terms of whether that obscured content was hipped and left behind by his (grand)mother, (grand)father, .....

• "Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me. Surely you desire truth in the inner being; You teach me wisdom in the inmost place" (Psalm of David-51:5-17).

By paraphrasing Job: "It is the spirit in (wo)man, human being, the breath of the Almighty, that gives her/him the capability something to conceive, comprehend and understand (understanding) [Job-32:8]."

Dialectically synthesising this dialectical content with the previously elaborated one regarding the fictional mother, no any mother is able truly to love ANYONE in such dark moments, even her own child. Furthermore, during such dark moments, driven by this dark (negative) emotional content, making any (important) decision should be avoided ["Unleash the fury of your wrath" (Job-40-6:14)]. So when thou love thyself in the spiritual sense (not in the egoistic ones), thou in fact cultivates and keep alive this inborn relationship between thou and the God, understood in terms of an additional REFRESHING thy inner being DIA inmost one over the passage of time DIA space in order to increase thy capabilities of the dialectical synthesizing using this kind of communication on long distances. On the other hand, the continual darkening of the inner being DIA inmost one, without to be from time to time cleaned it and in this way to be renewed this communication channel, understood in terms of being compared to the source of all love and knowledge (God), can lead over passage of the time DIA space, that fictional mother by unconscious transferring this obscured dark mix (a kind of the inner darkened 'cocktail') into her child, becomes also narcotic-like addicted to and dependant on this kind of relationship with her child (the blind love). Furthermore, when dealing with challenges of the external world, she is ready to do all for the success (note, NOT for the good) of her child. Even if this success is achieved at the expense of children, who belongs to other mothers. This is an another example of narrow-mindedness in the life reality. Keep thereby in mind that even in the world of animals was observed that there are cows, which allow a calf of "foreign descent" to suck the milk (which actually belongs to her own one).

In short, you can open many earthly doors to your own child using various evil- and ill-minded practices at the expense of other children, but at very high price of closing her, his heavenly doors. On the other hand, to the children belonging to other mothers, who possess DIA managed to retain enough light inside their inner beings DIA inmost one, by these well-known dirty earthly methods, you cannot close them these heavenly doors because of the power of their inner beings dia the accumulated spiritual light over passage of the time dia space. Apart from this, this mixed dark cocktail can be manifested in various ways in the everyday life. For example, many (grand)parents are ready to do all for their children, even if they know very well that their children are bad persons. It seems, according to their behaviour, even such bad or vile children are the only true wealth: Earthly one. The heavenly is not (so) important to them. In spite of this, keep in mind, God only has need for GOOD children (quality instead of quantity: tax-payers, solders ...).

Hope, you can now better to understand what happens in the moments of jealousy, envies and other manifestations of the so-called emotional (hopefully temporal) madness, ignited by the above elaborated darkened 'cocktail'. So children all over the world, each time when you hear that your mother argues that she loves you the most in the world, EVEN MORE THAN HERSELF, remind her that she first start to love her more than you, and then with this ennobled love to re-enlighten the inborn mother's love towards her child. In short, she TRULY and GENUINELY can LOVE THEE in the extent she has true love inside her inner being. And it is precisely this excess of love problematic, that is, where she draws it from [from which source this comes from?]. Keep in mind, that EVEN (Great) prophets and (special) emissaries of God did not possess the inexhaustible source of this kind of love within their Inner Beings DIA Inmost One. And what (s)he does in such cases? (S)He, similarly to a small baby, who instinctively searches the breast of her, his mother, reconnects her-, himself to the only true source of love: God's love, and then continues with accomplishing her, his life mission.

So mothers worldwide, if you feel from time to time, you are tired with maintaining the established relationship over passage of time DIA space (with any of your children), understood in terms of having no power to do it, reread, and then reconsider the all aforementioned. This is suggested it to you as an ANTITHESIS (not as a commandment) to be dialectically synthesised with the antithesis suggested by your (grand)mother, (grand)father, close family members and friends, together with your own accumulated experience over time DIA space (spirit, mind dia reason, matter). Who knows, perhaps this dialectical interactive content can give some hints to those who established a love relationship here on the earth by intention to cultivate it in a longer span of time DIA space. In other words, in a world where prevails evil, a genuine personal relationship is much more difficult to establish, and particularly, to maintain it in time DIA space. At the same time, no any enlightened person is able to grasp that someone can waste her, his time DIA space during a personal relationship, on the silly and useless evil-igniting "discussions", observed here on the earth, such as, for example, quarrelling initiated by some nonsense and the like. In other words, if it is not feasible continually to make each other a pleasant day, than at least try not to spoil this pleasure to thy partner. Particularly, when both partners acquired the related experience by living with many partners, an another example of the unsuccessful implementation of the freedom of will DIA choice in the life reality.

This comment was not done to be understood in terms of giving someone a kind of lectures, moral instructions and the like

• [apart from the suggestion, you should be happy instead of being sad when someone took over your partner during these trial times DIA spaces of "acquiring experiences", that is, before the children came on the world, and then someone took them either mother or father. In other words, for each of you, another partner is much easier to find than for your child to find a (good step-) mother/-farther],

but only to show that the generally accepted concept of the freedom of will DIA choice does not function in this sphere too. And can anyone suggest to this creator of knowledge, where this concept does function?

No doubt, that the previously uttered dialectical content will have some impact on the interpretation of the notion of love, understood in terms of the ruling mob DIA group way of thinking, that is, how this concept was accomplished by some "great" persons of past. In other words, how they enslaved DIA destroyed other people because they, simply said, loved so much the own nation. On the other hand, this creator of knowledge argues as opposed to various glorified 'Alexanders Greats, Attilas, Genghis Cans, Sulemans Magnificent, Napoleons, Hitlers, Stalins ....' the point is not in occupying the huge territory or market by FORCE, using the military means, but rather in to retain this in hands over a dialectically long span of time DIA space. On the other hand, the great creative persons managed by the power of the truth, trust and love of His, creatively acting by pen (fether and ink, for example, as a mighty weapon) to "occupy DIA capture" the hearts of many individual citizens world-wide.

Even if the word goes only about a few percentages of their admirers, a large "imperium" was created in this humane way, still greater than any existing one, especially, seen from the dialectically long-run perspective. Unfortunately, many of them achieved it after their death. In short, this creator of knowledge, as the true and genuine follower of the Eternal God DIA LIVING One, to NOBODY gave the right, including the members of his family, to participate in cultivation of this illusive cult of death, based on the dead body, which is not a lasting fundament, especially, if that person was not respected while he was still alive. The worst of all, the cult of death can be used as a tool for carrying out their well-known, but very narrow-minded interests and goals. In my opinion, this way of making anyone greater DIA 'MORE LOVED' after her, his death than (s)he was loved during her, his life is a pure abuse of the dead body (for satisfying business, political, .... purposes).

Now let's go back to finish one more initiated but still not finished dia-process. In short, what is TRUE benefit of the earlier mentioned occupation and usurpation of space and time, if it is short-lived, as well as acquired at the price of subduing or a (complete or partial) extermination their inhabitants from the historical stage (acquiring in this way large number of enemies both on the earth and Heaven), what has been DIA will be the repeated scenario in time DIA this situation space in a world, where evil prevails. Similarly these 'great' business(wo)men, earning money at any price and at the expense of others, (top) managers, members of the board of directors, ... foremen only in fact build the hidden TOMB for their offspring DIA themselves (Job-21:19-21). This clearly shows that any lasting benefit cannot be achieved DIA retained by the means of DESTRUCTION, ruthless exploitation of others, enslavement of others, including the modern ways of doing it: All such creations will be wiped out from this great creative stage, sooner or later. Alleluia!

• “Better little with righteousness than much gain with injustice (Proverbs-16:8). Woe to her, him who builds her, his palace by unrighteousness, her, his rooms by injustice, making her, his country(wo)men to work for nothing, not paying them for their labour" (Jeremiah-22:13).

Concluding this creative article, the real benefits can be only achieved by the CREATION (creative acting), and then retained by (speaking, cultivating, demonstrating) the power of TRUTH, TRUST, LOVE of His, based on the first three commandments, and making appropriate decisions by distinguishing GOOD from evil (choices). After all aforementioned, do you still believe that the previously mentioned 'heroes' truly LOVED their own people (nations) DIA were truly SO GREAT, as it was ascribed to them by the various nationalists and vile natiocrates, or simply they chased DIA tried to satisfy their (short-term, narrow-minded) egoistic objectives? If to this was added that after their death, dia-processes of continual decline of their created empires were initiated, hope, you figured out, what this creator of knowledge wanted to say. In other words, if you TRULY love your children, family, co-fellows, or nation, you will try to show with thy (creative) acting them THE WAY that leads to the eternity DIA infinity. ALL less of this (way), means IN FACT you love them MUCH LESS than you imagined in your head.

• Static DIA Dynamic Math reflected through Prism of the Dialectic Interactive Approach
• The Methodological Consequences of the Way of Thinking based on the Static DIA Dynamic Mathematic
• The Static DIA Dynamic Mathematik in the Living Reality: The Training of the Philosophic DIA Artistic Dialect
• The Concept of the Simple(st) Mind in the Living Reality: The Training of the Philosophic DIA Artistic Dialect

• Plato Timaeus - Part Two: A creative traveling through the dialectical understanding of the time DIA space
• Eternal Poem: Act One
• The Concept of the Living God
• Culture DIA Religion
• Capabilities of the Modern Mind seen from a Perspective of the Creating Knowledge
• Dialectic Triad of the Bringing Up, Edification and Education of New Generations
• Cultivation of the Inhereted DIA Acquired Spiritual Capabilities over Time DIA Space
• Culture DIA Religion Reflected through the Prism of a Rose
• Dialectical Concept of the Spiritual DIA Mindual Intelligence
• Consequences of the Vulgarisation of Simple(st) Mind in the Living Reality
• The Used Notions
• Introduction into Dialectic Interactive Approach
• Travellings within the World of Dialectics
• Creative Travellings in Time DIA Space: "Plato-Timaeus" - 1
• Debtor's DIA Debt Economics: Part One

• The Concept of Simple Mind
• About the Conflict within the Simple(st) Mind
• An Upshot of the Conflict within the Simple(st) Mind: The Concept of a Simple-Minded Person
• Implications of the Conflict within the Simple(st) Mind
• Fundaments of the Mental-Emotional Intelligence
• "More about the Simple(st) Mind" written on the serbian language

• Basic Ideas of the Netmodal Business Organising
• Netmodal Management Process
• Netmodal Management Model
• Netmode in a Virtual Environment
• Virtual Company
• Echo of the Exposed Virtual Ideas in the Ruling Strategic Created Reality