Dialectical Creative Framework for Orientation in the Eternity of Times DIA Infinity of Spaces
Couple Dialect: Thesis DIA Antithesis
Synthese DIA "G" → The Renewed Thesis in the Time DIA Space
It is important to be emphasised here that in the dialectical framework for orientation in time DIA space, there are neither boundaries (in objectivistic terms) among dialects - spirit, mind, matter, nor among dialects - future, presence, and past because each of them is a (multiple) dialectical synthesis of the two others. For example, the dialect - mind DIA reason as a MEDIUM [note, not the converged (fused) mind but the made free (released) mind] is a dialectical synthesis of the dialect - spirit "in/by/and/through/with/for" (≈ DIA) the dialect - matter. In the same way are defined the other two. Similarly, the dialect - future, in the role of driver-guid, is a dialectical synthesis of the dialect - emotively emotional dia physical presence DIA the dialect past and so on. READ, "Dialectic Interactive Approach: Dialectical Comprehending the Time DIA Space". The knowledge of these very, very basic assumptions and the related dialectics allows creators of knowledge to RECONSIDER different scenarios DIA situations in time DIA space ("movie - reconstructions"), using this (self-)awareness and the accumulated knowledge of dialectics, understood in terms of dialectical qualitative reasoning of this dialectical content.
For example, it can be applied FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION of a past scenario in time DIA suitable situation in space, by assigning to the dialect - past the role of driver-guid, and then by using the dialects future DIA (creative) presence (of the actor), as a medium for presentation of this reconstructed past. Note that in this case was used the dialect emotively emotional presence AS A MEDIUM because I-thou-we are able only to present something in terms of my / thy [physical DIA the emotively emotional (imaginative)] presence, regardless whether it has been dealt with a future or past scenario in time DIA suitable situation in space. Since here it deals with a DIALECTICALLY qualitative way of thinking, creator (of) knowledge has to know something about that age [the past age, which is in focus in this example], and about the key-individuals as well, and about the people generally speaking: Spirit, mind dia reason, matter both on the individual and collective (and whole crowd) level. Creators (of) knowledge have to take into consideration that what were basic assumptions on the individual, collective and whole (crowd) level was different, compared it to the present (existing methodological) ones, understood in terms of both time and space. As a pattern for thinking, read thoughtfully the following case - example.
Implementation of the Acquired Knowledge of Dialectics - a Case Study Example
For example, what was accepted on the collective (material and mind) level was different in Europe and America, by comparing these continents before than they were reconnected by (DIA) Colombo. Due to the internationalisation process, these differences were reduced. I mean, on the level of the dialects matter and mind, people in Europe and America in those days were separated. In other words, separated in terms of what was accepted as reality, and presented in the existing ruling mediums. On the other hand, on the spiritual, imaginative, intuitive level of the Great Picture, they were not separated. Although Colombo discovered a new continent searching for India [driven by the dialects - mind and matter: By the logics and material motives, determined from a perspective of the big picture of those gone days from a perspective of crowd DIA group], it might be argued that the discovering of America had been driven by the eternal desire (of the SPIRIT) to be found out (disclosed): Who I-thou-we are, where I-thou-we come from, are I-thou-we alone in the world of dialectics and the like. Expressed and interpreted in a dialectical way, the meaning is that they INTUITED, sensed, felt and "knew" it, that is, they (subconsciously) were aware of the existence of each other. Similarly to that, still driven by the same "simple / simplest" mind, the "WE" [notice not I-thou-we but always "we", either on the behalf of nation or group of them] explore universe, searching for new resources (matter), and even (by the way) for the existence of Life [as a result of the power of subdued spirit]. At the SAME TIME AND SPACE, "we"
- [in dialectical terms, on the fundamental level of Great Picture, as a consequence of the imposed crowd DIA group way of thinking, responsibility is the common due to the multi-interactivity DIA multiple-(inter)dependence, understood in terms of various (divergent) actors’ intentionalities, although it can be qualitatively graduated by separating it on the level of world, genus, folk, nation, clan, family, individual]
are destroying our common environment, resources, continue with the killing human(e) beings, annihilate life
and the like. Perceive this CONFLICT: THE "WE" search for a new life environments, resources and life in the
universe (SEARCHING IN ORDER TO KILL IT??) and at the same time and space, 'we' destroy the existing life
environment, resources and life. In other words, they DIA ‘them’ are destroying all and everything [human(e)]
common to me-thou-us, triggered, driven and led by the conflict within the simple(st) mind.
Express thy opinion related to the conflict inside "simple" and ”simplest” mind, as well as thy spiritual, imaginative, intuitive, emotive impressions of the process of internationalisation, and of the process of cosmosation (universesation) as well.
Methodological Reasoning DIA Comprehending of the (Recti)linear Space and Time, understood AS SOMETHING OUTSIDE OF "US"
This conflict is the conflict (with)in our common living fundament, DRIVEN BY THE INNER CONFLICT INSIDE "simple(st)" mind [converged (fused) mind and continually subdued and suffocated spirit] and the suitable compromise between them DIA dialect - matter. A perceivable consequence of this INNER CONFLICT within the (concept of the) "simple(st)" mind is the conceiving DIA comprehending of the (recti)linear space and time, (externally understood) AS SOMETHING OUTSIDE OF "US". The solution for our civilisation is the (re)establishment of a "new" fundament, by separating dialects - spirit and mind, giving them back the right (inborn) roles and place, understood in terms of both time and space. This can be only done successfully, by starting and finishing these dialectical processes on the level of Great Picture (whole), by involving each (most of the) talented individual, human(e) beings. For sure, the dialect spirit [ truth, trust, love in pure "form" (sense), although the most advanced individual is for now very far from this ideal] will lead in the long-run our civilisation into the Great Future, which begins with the Moon, Mars and so forth (to Heaven). The existing problems caused by this inner conflict within the inner being DIA inmost one will gradually disappear. The freed power of the (higher) knowledge can be used as a locomotion for making (positive) changes. Instead of spending dialect - matter (resources), mind (creative medium), spirit (feelings as well as other emotive emotions) for destroying the (living) environment and humans, as well as our common fundament, I-thou-we [all of us humans, who share the suitable system of HUMAN AND HUMANE VALUES] can use them for the making positive changes in the made hard environment on the Earth by them, and after that to continue with it on the Moon, Mars ...., by settling it by life, etc. CREATION INSTEAD OF THE DESTROYING, because the Creation is eternal, infinite, and thus only creation DIA creativity leads to the eternity DIA infinity; DESTRUCTION NOWHERE, or to the very very beginning, if you still like this interpretation of darkness (read the following case study).
Train both thy Imagination and Intuition as well as thy Emotive Emotions
Reconsidered from a strategic viewpoint (of interpretation) of this conflict, the question is, what would have been happend, if a "foreign" civilisation would had been managed to find (and visit) us. By definition, even in strategic terms too, this means that this cosmic civilisation is technically much more advanced than our civilisation. They found us and not reverse. What if they are not humanlike friendly, and decide to simply utilise this omnipresent conflict by subjugating a part of us, and (mis)using the rest of us in this purpose. It is not unknown in our very rich 'strategic' past. In "strategic" terms, the meaning is very simple. We suddenly found us in a bad (strategic) position, in troubles, problems or in bullshit, if you like this interpretation.
From a dialectical point of view, expressed and understood in terms of time DIA space, this is only a
question of luck, fate, intentionalality as well as dependent on the skills of the Driver of this universe.
But this Driver can only properly listen to our fundamental wishes, or "instructions", if you like this interpretation,
expressed and understood in terms of co-ordinates of Future, Presence, Past (Time) DIA Spirit, Mind, Matter
(Space). It is very difficult, by listening each of us, to be fulfilled all our wishes. But, Driver is still trying it,
as well as to avoid the related confusion by making decisions in the State of Great dialectical Synthesis of
His Great Picture. When the situation is too confused He sends His (Arch)angels. In an emergency situation,
He sends His Son. All Human(e) beings are His children. They respect and love Him because He respects
and loves all of them. He is Holly Truth because He never lies. He is Absolute Trust because He shows trust
to all of them. He is Absolute Love because He loves everyone. He is the Best Guide (Strategist) because He
only knows the way in(to) the Great Future. He is the Greatest Creator: Holly Ideal of all creators (of) knowledge.
What is thy opinion related to the afore uttered dialectical content? Bingo! Express it using thy imagination, intuition and particularly thy emotive emotions. Interpret it too through interaction with others.
As far as I understand the scientists, they claim that our universe is expanding (better said, grows). Note, not creators of knowledge because scientist sometimes interprets only what is actual in the existing (ruling group's) mind (medium), based on the mental faculty (capacity). On the other hand, a creator of knowledge always interprets from her / his inner DIA innermost being, understood in terms of spirit, mind dia reason, matter DIA suitable time (future, presence, past), based on the mentally - emotively emotional intelligence. In dialectical terms, the better interpretation is to present universe as a gigantic “space shuttle", which is driven by the Driver, and constantly qualitatively expanded (understood in terms of good: The phase of growing) to be prevented its contraction (and decay). In other words, relations are neither static nor dynamic but rather dialectical ones: Intentional, stochastic and sporadic, as well as unitive, contradictive, transitive, transformative, annihilative, annulative (negating), negative. Hence, even a catastrophe (particularly, chaotic one) measured in terms of milliards light years can change considerably the "position" of our Earth, of Galaxy, understood in terms of both time and space, that is, where and when we are going to finish the given mission.
In dialectical terms, this event means a new multiple (multifaceted) dialectical synthesis(es). In other words, Earth, Solar System, Galaxy (Milky Way, for example) can theoretically drop, lift up in the eternity of times DIA infinity of spaces, in any direction, resulting with a new position (dialectical synthesis), understood in terms of both time and space. Cataclysmic earthquakes, volcano eruptions, deluges, ice ages and the like might be consequences of it as well. Our common presentation of time and space is only our (illusion), forged in the mind DIA (subdued) spirit (a medium) and interpreted by (the five common scientific) senses. At the same time DIA space, this illusion is very useful in the simple(st) world of time and space because it gives choice to the individuals to see (perceive) objects both (either) as static (thou are sitting) and (or) dynamic (thou are running, flying), although each of these states is actually dialectical, all this time DIA suitable space. Reconsidered from a methodologically creative standpoint, it allows any of us to be aware of (existence of) various divergent intentionalities, giving in this way to individuals, teams (groups) the opportunity DIA ability, understood in terms of the time DIA suitable space, to create, adapt the existing environment as they want. Seen from a human perspective, to create, adapt the environment for the good of human(e) beings in the broadest feasible sense, and not only for satisfaction of the narrow-minded interests of akin groups.
THE PRAGMATIC VIEW ON THE SPACE (SPIRIT, MIND DIA REASON, MATTER) UNDERSTOOD IN TERMS OF THE TIME:
(Recti)linear Creative Framework for the Orientation in Time AND Space
Dialectical Creative Framework for Orientation in the Eternity of Times DIA Infinity of Spaces
It will be tried to be conjured up in a dialectical way the present situation in space DIA the suitable scenario in time, where the dialect PRESENT TIME
- [the existing medium, understood in terms of the so-called (recti)linear (binary) time DIA related dual way of thinking],
interpreted as a dialectical synthesis of the dialect future (driver) DIA the past, was fitted by the (masked) "SIMPLE(ST)" MIND
- [the existing (deserted) central medium (creatively blank hollow), understood in terms of the (recti)linear (dual) space],
which is a dialectical synthesis of the "simple" mind (notice again the "simple" mind, presented as the fused mind - spirit) DIA the dialect matter. Recall, it is very difficult to be determined (a personal story), whether the dialect mind (illusionary) abandoned its innate room DIA place, or / and from there SIMPLY OCCUPIED the inborn room DIA place (expansion), reserved for the dialect spirit. In either case, it was assigned the role of the past to the dialect matter because knowledge workers (scientists "modernists") are more interested DIA focused on the mental processes, which are, according to them, more related to the dialect - future, speaking in general terms. READ, "Capabilities of the Modern Mind seen from a Perspective of the Creating Knowledge" But due to the dialectical tensions between the dialect - past and / through / by / with (≈ DIA), the dialect PRESENT TIME DIA future, uttered and understood in terms of the dialect matter(ialistic conceiving of all and everything) DIA the concept of the "simple" mind, especially in this constellation, where the dialect - "simple(st)" mind plays double role (both the dialects future and the present time), it is very difficult to be tuned (fitted) a proper (qualitative) dialectical synthesis within this (recti)linear (dual) presentation of time and the suitable space. Due to this unnatural mix, the dialectical synthesis on the level of whole can only be achieved by a strong (over)emphasise of the dialect matter. In other words, seen from a dialectical perspective, the dialect matter RULES in such a conceptually developed (dialectical) world DIA its continual binary (recti-)linearization in terms of TIME AND SPACE.
In strategic terms, considered from a standpoint of the crowd (DIA group) way of thinking, it might be argued, the dialect matter UTILISED THE INNER CONFLICT between the dialects mind and spirit on the level of whole. In other words, the dialect converged (fused) mind - spirit has used too much time, by spending (spent) my-thy-our future (life) and resources (dialect - matter), that is, it spends (spent) my-thy-our resources, transforming thereby itself into a kind of drug addicted person, where the dialect matter is narcotic (opium) for this kind of mind. And all it in order to be further subdued and suffocated the dialect spirit. Or uttered it in the everyday language, all this has been done to be subdued and suffocated emotively emotional potential, capacity, vitality, and the related emotive emotions, heart, soul and the like. The utmost RESULT: This kind of the coalesced (converged) mind - spirit has ILLUSION of possessing "real" POWER (illusion to rule) on the level whole. Reconsidered from a dialectical perspective [synthesis always means neutrality (impartiality), otherwise it is not a dialectical one], the dialect - fused mind is dependent, and by definition subordinated to the dialect - MATTER, because it is HIGHLY dependent on it. In this interpretation, seen from a crowd perspective (level of the world), I-thou-we are able to observe two (more accurately seven DIA seven and so on) major dialectical processes (dia-processes). The first one, where the dialect - mind tries to push the dialect - spirit [emotively emotional potential and the related emotive emotions] out of the spatial (and time's) dialect ("dimension"), by further subduing and suffocating it. The second one, where the dialect matter FILLS UP THIS DESERTED, EMPTY SPACE AND TIME [the ossification of this desolated dialectical world], actually A BLANK HOLLOW without bottom, seen from a creative perspective, that came into being as a result of the further vulgarisation of the simplest DIA vulgar mind.
A Dialectical View on the Simple Mind, Seen from a Mathematical Perspective
Or by uttering this dialectical content in another way, this scenario in time and the suitable situation in space, where two actors (dialect fused mind and spirit) were made busy with the quarrel and dispute with each other, the third one (dialect matter) utilised this opportunity TO OCCUPY this left behind time and space, although not so creative and skilled "one" at all. And the worst of all, for example, such privileged companies, where dominates the simplest DIA vulgar mind, never become bankcrupt, although it should be so, as a final result of the wrong recruiting (personal) policy of the "human" resources. As A WELL-KNOWN consequence of this kind of the 'market' run economy, in such established natiocratic societies, nothing can be changed at all. In other words, there is no any possibility for those (individuals and collective units), who think differently, to get long-awaited opportunity, that is, to be replaced the existing trouble-makers (and the related way of thinking) IN A MARKET WAY. READ, "Capabilities of the Modern Mind seen from a Perspective of the Creating Knowledge". As a final result of all this, the dialect simple(st) mind is neither the Great Driver NOR A GREAT MEDIUM, READ, "The Concept of the Simple(st) Mind in the Living Reality: The Training of the Philosophic DIA Artistic Dialect", and never will become it UNTIL GETTING RID OF ITS ILLUSIONS.
Source: "Netmode - the Strategy for the 21st Century - Dialectic Interactive Approach" (Jovanovic, 1999).
READ the Next Part of the Dialectic Interactive Approach: