Your browser does not support scripts; to use all features enable it

  An Upshot of the Conflict within the Simple(st) Mind: The Concept of a Simple-Minded Person

Methodological Reasoning DIA Comprehending of the (Recti)linear Space and Time, understood AS SOMETHING OUTSIDE OF 'US'

(Recti)linear Creative Framework for the Orientation in Time AND Space

In this creative article, it will be continued with a further reinterpretation of the concept of the simple(st) mind within the context of the presented dialectical way of comprehending time DIA space, understood in terms of SPIRIT, MIND dia REASON, MATTER (space) DIA FUTURE, EMOTIVELY EMOTIONAL dia PHYSICAL PRESENCE, PAST (time), as a counterpart to the ruling crowd ('WE') way of thinking (the level of the whole). Now, I-thou-we are ready to apply the until now acquired knowledge (of dialectics) at the individual and collective (group) level. I-thou-we will use the already presented and interpreted pattern for thinking, elaborated in the previous part of this creative article: Reread the section: "THE PRAGMATIC VIEW ON THE SPACE (SPIRIT, MIND, MATTER) UNDERSTOOD IN TERMS OF THE TIME". This situation and scenario, on the individual-group (more correct grouped - individual) level within the (RECTI)LINEAR TIME AND SPACE, will be presented by the three strategists of the present days. The first two of them are converged (fused) into a "simply-reasonable person" [which draws ideas from the concept of the simple(st) mind, being captured within the (cask of the) present time], where the "second" strategist is subordinated to the "first" one. In other words, the "second" strategist is not authorised to make decisions, but still has the (cap)ability (power) to speak, although the "first" strategist spends most of the available time and resources (space in time) on the keeping silent of the "second" one. In order to be able to subdue even further the "second" strategist, the "first" one has need for more and more resources and time. In other words, for more and more (various manifestations of the dialect) MATTER, that was, in this constellation of the (recti)linear time and space, assigned to the dialect-past. When this dialectical sentence is translated by the everyday language, its meaning is that this kind of the [fused (coalesced)] mind allows a continuous embedding into the dialect PRESENT (TIME: "barrel") the dialect-past and dialect-matter from the past, and not from the dialect future (time in space). At the same time and space, here it could be risen the crucial question, from which one of future (of these two available futures of his)? By the way said, this kind of the subordination (subduing) within the fused (coalesced) mind is AN INEXHAUSTIBLE SOURCE OF IDEAS for the crowd DIA group way of thinking.


Static Math reflected through Prism of the Dialectic Interactive Approach

Methodological Reasoning DIA Comprehending of the (Recti)linear Space and Time, understood AS SOMETHING OUTSIDE OF US

Although, at the level of this whole, this "simple-reasonable person" presented her- / himself as the ONE, that the "it", the "simply-minded person” (with a hollow in the head?) [notice not as (s)he, because there two of them: Two coalesced (fused) "beings" into a kind of "group"] is driven and guided by (their?) future, thereby like the parrot it claims, "it" will lead the company (nation, society, world) into a great future. If I-thou-we put these promises in the everyday living reality, by using the developed dialectical framework for the orientation in time DIA space, where the dialect PRESENT (TIME: "cask") is interpreted, as the dialectical synthesis of the dialect future (guide-driver) DIA the dialect past, was fitted by the "simple(-minded) one" [medium, in fact a creatively blank hollow: "barrel"], which is a (multiple in time DIA space) dialectical synthesis of the fused mind - spirit ["simple-minded one" again!] DIA the dialect-matter. It was assigned the role of the past to the dialect-matter, because the hollowed "simple-minded one” was not at all interested for the dialect-past. This "simple-reasonable person" even publicly emphasized that "it" is leader to the future and driven (led) by the future (incentives) as well. The essential question is which one future? Whether "it" was guided with the "PRESENT" future and / or with the "FUTURE" futures, because this "simple-minded person", by usurping both of them, is in the role of both the dialect ('future') present (time) and the dialect-future. These "(KINDS OF) FUTURES" [notice the plural: Future, seen as one dialect, is one and only one] are source of all problems and confusions, by which I-thou-we are met in the everyday living reality understood in terms of the suitable manipulations of the public opinion, and which were put under this dialectical creative reconsideration. The rest of this story is even imaginable at this moment [of thy emotively emotional presence], without a need of going (further in the physical sense) into such a "future", by spending it (the time), as well as the necessary resources (dialect-matter) and dialect-spirit DIA thy mind (the space) too. Read the next case study example.

  The Exercise of Dialectic Synthesising

1. Consider carefully the data placed in the following table. Note, the qualitative difference in the dialectical interpretation of the meaning between the linguistic expressions: Space-Time [emphasising static dimension (space)] and Time-Space [emphasising dynamic (time) dimension]. What are your first impressions related to their qualitative meaning and sense? Bingo! Interpret it both through internal and external interaction.

Space - Time

Time - Space

1.

Spirit

1.

Future

2.

Mind

2.

Presence

3.

Matter

3.

Past

4.

Future

4.

Spirit

5.

Presence

5.

Mind

6.

Past

6.

Matter


Dialectical Creative Framework for Orientation in the Eternity of Times DIA Infinity of Spaces

Dialectical Creative Framework for Orientation in the Eternity of Times DIA Infinity of Spaces

2. In the dialectics the order (mode) how the symbols were placed is very important because this determines the process of dialectical synthesising and its quality (meaning), respectively the qualitative meaning of the interpreted and presented creative outcome. Now I-thou-we will try together to give an additional interpretation, related to the meaning of the famous Bible’s symbol 666. This symbol originates from a very, very old wisdom (of God), which was based on the dialectics. Consider carefully this table once more. Bingo! Note, the numbers 3 and 6 in each part of the table. Bingo! Three six(s) [3 * 6]. Bingo! If I-thou-we dialectically synthesise and translate together this dialectical sentence, the meaning from the Space-Time dimension is: Matter: 3 (6=past). In other words, the dialect-matter wants dialect-past instead of the (dialect) future, the dialect-past instead of the dialect presence, past, that is, past-past-past. Or more simply said, the dialect-matter wants the dialect-past FOREVER. Bingo! In eternity of times DIA infinity of spaces, past, that is, at the level of Great Picture. Bingo!


The meaning from the Time-Space dimension is: Past: 3 (6 =matter). In other words, the dialect-past wants the dialect-matter instead of the dialect-spirit, the dialect-matter instead of the dialect-mind, matter, that is, matter - matter - matter. In other words, the dialect-past wants the dialect-matter EVERYWHERE. Bingo! Note, if the order of symbols (words) in the table was different the meaning of 666 would be altered. And now pay thy attention, what the goal of the 'obscured (dark) mind'is to achieve in our universe, as well as at the level of Great Picture, related to a so basic assumption, such as the Space-Time DIA Time-Space dimension: The dialect-matter EVERYWHERE and the dialect-past FOREVER in eternity DIA infinity. Bingo! Shall I-thou-we allow coming into being this obscured scenario in time DIA suitable situations in space of darkness? Bingo! I say, NEVER! What is thy answer (response)? Bingo!


3. Compare this goal with the manipulations, I talked about, in regard with the "concept of simple(st) mind DIA the various simple-reasonable persons (with the abandoned hollows in heads)". Bingo! Impress this deeply in thy inner being DIA inmost one, regarding the "unconscious and subconscious" activities and suitable actions of the various "simple-reasonable ones”, seen from the perspective of dialectical symbol: 666. Use thy imagination, intuition, emotive emotions, as well as thy mental-logical thinking, in order to be achieved a full mentally-emotiv emotional "picture". Do you think a better picture would be, for example, the dialects - spirit and future everywhere and forever? Impress and express it through interaction, both in the internal and external sense.

4. Try to continue with a further synthesising of 666 into 66. Bingo! Interpret the meaning of 66 both through internal and external interaction!


Implications of the Conflict within the Simple(st) Mind

Bipolar DIA Binary Way of Thinking

Debtor's DIA Debt Economics: Part - 1

Ultimate Result of the Binary Way of Thinking: The Concept of Absolute Truth

5. Try to continue with a further synthesising 66 into 6. Bingo! Interpret the meaning of the "gate of death" (DIA a new life), both through the internal and external interaction.

6. Try to dialectically synthesise the meanings of each meaningful combination. For example, what is the meaning, 6-past and 6-matter, as an expression of space-time and time-space dimension? Bingo! Interpret it both through internal and external interaction.

7. Tell a story, based on thy interpretations of the symbol 666 to thy children, or to someone, who thou truly DIA sincerely love, respect.


By the previously expressed pattern of thought, founded on the basic postulates of the concept of the simple, simpler & simplest mind DIA the related conflict within it [fused mind - spirit), was developed the concept of a "simplest - minded (reasonable) person". Actually, the behaviour of such simply-reasonable persons are OBSERVABLE (perceivable) everywhere in the living reality. In other words, such a typical natiocratic person was introduced, who is capable to speak one linguistic content publicly [babbling (prattling ) - simply by releasing her, his subdued spirit, that is, to speak what people wanted to hear], simultaneously to think a quite another, while accomplishing in the background (within the earlier explained empty hollow) a 666 scenario in time DIA the suitable situation in space. Read too Proverbs-1:22-33. In order to be easier engraved the words of this simply - reasonable person in the akin fused and coalesced minds of her, his listeners (worshipers), (the concept of) the simple(st) mind was further made simpler, understood in terms of using the five "scientific" senses for the orientation in time AND space by such typical simple-reasonable persons, instead of the SEVEN ones of a humane being, that even further narrowed their horizons for the orienting in the multitude of the worlds of dialectics. In other words, by locking up (bounding) their frames of reference (inner being DIA the inmost light), this was manifested in the everyday reality by the bipolar (recti-)linear way of thinking, and based on the binary way of thinking, that is, as the well-known: mind-body, yes-no, black-white, true-false and the alike.


Methodological Reasoning DIA Comprehending of the (Recti)linear Space and Time, understood AS SOMETHING OUTSIDE OF 'US'

A Dialectical View on the Simple Mind, Seen from a Mathematical Perspective

The Static DIA Dynamic Mathematik in the Living Reality: The Training of the Philosophic DIA Artistic Dialect

Gravitational Abysses ("0" - Black Holes) Bounded with the Numbers (Values) TWO (2) AND ZERO (0)

As a consequence of this (ideologically DIA 'theologically') implanted binary "chip", just pay thy attention, how most of the people are only capable to reason in terms of the bipolar way of thinking, that is, during a conversation they continually go from a (n extreme) pole (of thought) to the another one. In other words, for them it seems there is, neither possibility nor feasibility even to think in terms of SOMETHING BETWEEN ("blank hollow") these two extremities (poles) because during the (recti)linear bipolar interaction IN TIME AND SPACE, the "MATHEMATICAL" interactive range for the manoeuvring is VERY LIMITED. READ: "Capabilities of the Modern Mind seen from a Perspective of the Creating Knowledge". In short, there is no such a broad scope for the multi-interactive interplay between and among the dialects, set in a continuous dia-process, which allows the (multi) dialectical synthesising in time DIA SPACE (spirit, mind dia reason, matter), READ, "Dialectic Interactive Approach", understood in terms of dialectics of dialectics DIA negations of negations. READ, "Dialectic Interactive Approach: Dialectics of Dialectics DIA Negations of Negations". In such a rectilinear scenario in time and situation in space, there is no even sense, to propose the abandonment of this binary way of thinking, understood in terms of the (paradigmatic) shift of the way of thinking and deliberation. READ, "Dialectic Interactive Approach: The Methodological Creative Framework".


Source: "Netmode - the Strategy for the 21st Century - Dialectic Interactive Approach" (Jovanovic, 1999).


READ the Follwing Part: