Your browser does not support scripts; to use all features enable it

  Love Interpreted in terms of the Unity of Its Chosen Dialectical Triad through the Prism of Four Ancient Elements: Fire, Water, Air, Earth

The Symbol of the Human(e) Genus

The Symbol of the Human(e) Genus

Love is a very broad concept, so for this reason it is very difficult to define it clearly, although it has been tried since time immemorial. The simplest way is to consider this notion within the limits of the dual way of thinking, and then to pass this content through the prism of bipolar dia binary way of thinking, understood in terms of the interplay of its mutually opposed meanings or poles in time and space: I love-I do not love. Although this approach will not directly solve the problem of defining this concept, it will give a clearer initial idea of ​​what in fact love is, as well as how to express moments when love is no more (at least on one side). From this rectilinear concept of considering the concept of love, it also follows that love is (potentially) a changeable and oscillating concept in time and space. If to this is added that apart from this two-way flow of feelings or mutual way of expressing feelings of love, there is an one-sided way of expressing love (unrequited love) that occurs during the establishment of relationships between living beings; primarily between living beings (subjects) and things (objects). In short, it cannot be said that if someone loves some of their bought item (thing), it also loves him. Accordingly, if someone likes to eat roast lamb, it does not mean that the (dead) lamb also loves him, her. The same goes for the hungry wolf. Although these seemingly trivial and banal ways of expressing love, acquired without a deeper insight into the considered creative challenge of time, in the time DIA space, do not deserve to be mentioned, unfortunately, it is not so in real life, because love is a very complex concept, as previously pointed out.

  • Without entering into a deeper creative discussion, it could be argued that also various attempts, efforts and manifestations of reducing the partner to the object, as it deals with a purchased coat, heater, glass of wine and the like results and leads to the aforementioned oscillation, cooling and extinguishing the source of love, at least on one side.
  • Keep in mind that partnership and marriage, unlike dating or business partnership and established relationships, mostly means sharing common established time and space, from which it is not so easy to get out (it has its price), so you can easily forget that you are in relationship with a human being and not with some object (thing). Especially if it is taken into account that nurturing and maintaining this established interpersonal relationship is difficult and significantly complicated with various forms of external influence: financial problems, raising and bringing up children, the influence of parents and the wider cultural and social environment, various social obligations, job requirements, and so on.

From all the above, it follows that these one-sided, vague, egoistic including also narcissistic aspects and properties of love make it more difficult and confusing, that is, further complicate the definition and elaboration of the concept of love. It also follows from this that living beings (subjects) must face the truth both during unrequited love and during the oscillation of expressed love with the passage of time and space. Since the focus of this creative article will be on building interpersonal relationships, the third dialect of this triad will be mutual trust, without which there is no point in building and maintaining an established interpersonal partnership.

  • There is no doubt that the more complex the chosen concept - notions of this dialectical triad are, thy ultimate creative result will potentially have more weight and value. At the same time, this makes the interactively creative content much more difficult to dialectically summarize and synthetise, understood in terms of finding their common shared characteristics, expressed through the interdependence of selected dialects of the applied triad. In short, this choice of triad dialects should be in line with your intellectual abilities and capability to find these tiny details and hidden threads, which actually connect them into one compact whole.
  • At the same time, this in no way means that this concept under creative consideration should not be considered from the perspective of the application of some other related dialects of the triad-notions. On the contrary, it is desirable, because in this way, this considered concept will be developed even better, and therefore better understood as well. And most importantly, seen from the perspective of the dialectical interactive approach, the creation of a kind of absolute dogma will be avoided, which is in full accordance with the meaning and spirit of this methodological approach.
  • In other words, the selection of constituent dialects of the triad that contain and share common qualities and related characteristics, as well as that from this (emerging) creative framework of elaborated methodological structure can be extracted the meaning of the considered concept, and then be created an adequate creative work in the field of philosophy, culture, art and science, is not an easy task. In order to shorten this long story, far less buzzy terms can encourage, inspire, and arouse interest in a larger number of readers to continue reading and studying some topics of interest to them, which is based on some other (more complex) methodological settings.

This way of considering and identifying the perceived creative challenge within the dialectical understanding of time and space, that is, placing the perceived creative challenge in a broader context of related and interrelated concepts, is fully consistent with the dialectical interactive approach. Viewed from this dialectical methodological perspective, based on the individual humane way of thinking, each notion should be (re)considered, and then reinterpreted in terms of dialectical trinity dia dialectical unity of the thesis-antithesis-synthesis DIA renewed thesis, .... until a temporary conclusion was achieved. For this reason, this creator of knowledge uses in the creative works of his the dialectical triad of the closely related notions (truth, trust, love in this particular case) in order to express the full meaning of each of these three inter-related dialects within the triad under consideration. In other words, using this dialectical method of reflecting dialectical interactively creative content under consideration from the perspective of related concept-notions, a broader creative framework will be built and elaborated, as well as clearer contours of the image and presentation of the considered key concept-notion will be defined [love in this particular case].

After that, based on this structural framework of the applied methodological approach and its methods (template), various creative contents can be developed using the Fundamental Simulation Settings of the Dialectical Interactive Approach (culture, philosophy, art, science) to get an even clearer idea of ​​the key concept, creatively considering it from the point of view of the ultimate or probable methodological assumptions of the dialectical interactive approach. From this presented dialectical content it is clear that instead of a futile effort to define a concept-notion as if it were a quantitative mathematical equation, which has only one solution, dialectical interactive approach offers a potential set of qualitative answers related to the subject under creative consideration. By the way, pay attention to this negative influence of mathematics, as well as various related technological, mechanistic and systemic approaches and methods applied in the field of knowledge creation, based on these quantitative characteristics and properties unsuitable and inappropriate for humans.

Remember, the basic postulate of the dialectical interactive approach (DIA) is that the dialectical synthesising in terms of the so-called concept of "absolute truth" (within time DIA space, as a copy of the eternal model) is reserved for GOD, while for all others (creators of the human descent and root), this methodological approach (3 dia 1 dialect) is much more appropriate. Seen from this methodological perspective, by intermediating between these "dialectical worlds of value numbers", understood in terms of the time and spatial value of the considered dialectical content, while creatively acting in an earthly social environment, each dialectical content under creative consideration should be deduced to the number three (3 dialects) DIA a continual deducing this dialectical interactively creative content on the number one (1 dialect) in the most feasible extent of this way of dialectical synthesizing

  • using God as an ideal (role model), that is, trying to imitate, how God would have solved this creative challenge of the considered time dia the appropriate space (but not equalling yourself or try surpassing Him). The capability of dialectical synthesizing in this way depends on the purity of thy inner being dia the innermost one: the kingdom of ???? (Job-26:4). In the case that God is not the master of thy inner kingdom, this methodological approach may not be appropriate for you but rather a dual → bipolar dia binary methodical approach.
  • Keep in mind, creative activity in these modern natiocratic societies, as a result of the application of various kinds of manifestations of scientific materialism, has moved so far away from God that even such a symbolic mention of Him, or a quote from the Holy Books and Scriptures in creative purposes, can paralyze their five-sense creative abilities.

Or put it in another way, you are actually trying creatively to approach closer the set objective in this dialectical way, understood in terms of overcoming deepnesses, remoteness, and wideness (the creative gap) of the eternity of times DIA infinity of spaces, which actually separate a creator (of) knowledge (copy) from the owner of the "absolute truth DIA all knowledge(able)" (eternal ideal): the greatest (knowledge) Creator of all (us): God.

Culture DIA Religion

The Background Simulation Settings of the Dialectic Interactive Approach


Ultimate DIA Probable Methodological Presumptions of the Dialectic Interactive Approach

The Ultimate DIA Probable Methodological Presumptions of the Dialectic Interactive Approach

However, the dialectical synthesising in time DIA space using the four dialects DIA two pair of triangles (thesis - antithesis) for the thorough consideration and creative interpretation of a dialectical interactive content, understood in terms of implementation of the methodological creative framework of pairs of six-pointed stars DIA a twelve pointed one, and so on, is much closer to the capabilities of dialectical synthesizing of human beings. The next creative step is to pass and to reflect on this dialectical content through the sieve of three basic dialectical principles, aspects, properties, and manifestations in time DIA space in the sense of the creative action of the dialectical quartet (dia the triad) of dialectics dialectics DIA negations of negations of it within this star-like creative methodological framework. For example, if the topic of the falling in love, as an aspect or a precondition of the broader understanding the notion-love, is under creative consideration, then these four (three dia one) dialects (truth, trust, love dia falling in love) should be placed within the "Dialectical Creative Framework for Orientation in the Eternity of Times DIA Infinity of Spaces", and then these dialectical contents should be creatively reconsidered from the (tri)angles of the PHILOSOPHY, CULTURE, ART and SCIENCE [The Background Simulative Assumptions of the Dialectic Interactive Approach] through creatively expressing it from the viewpoint of "The Ultimate DIA Probable Presumptions of the Dialectic Interactive Approach".

Although methodology, understood in terms of developing and applying an appropriate methodological approach, is a very complex topic, this creator of knowledge will show in this creative article that after overcoming this type of "birth pangs" and the accompanying challenges of dialectical understanding of time and space, it is not said by a coincidence that a successfully developed and applied methodological approach is already more than half of the knowledge (which needs to be further created). In short, the rest is creation in cooperation with expressed creativity, reflected through the (narrow) prism of creative freedom, including (temporarily) filling in the missing links of knowledge (holes in the enigmatic puzzle of knowledge) with new ideas and thoughts by applying the creative power of thy innate faculties of imagination. Although in natiocratic orders, it is very difficult to realize many manifestation aspects of the concept - freedom, freedom of creation has the advantage that if it cannot be realized and materialized in the outer worlds of space in time (here and now), then at least it can be realized in the inner worlds of time in space (now and there). For this reason, continue reading this creative article to the end, paying special attention to the application of this currently most advanced methodological approach, which has come back to light from the inner worlds of oblivion, that is, revived by this creator of knowledge through retrospective recollecting, recalling and reviving this forgotten or lost methodological approach. For further info, READ: "Dialectic Interactive Approach: Its Methodological Creative Framework".

  complex relationships of truth, trust, and love reflected through the prism of distinguishing good from evil

Both in the living and business reality a lot of time DIA the appropriate space (spirit, mind dia reason, matter) has been spent on dealing with the triad of TRUTH, TRUST and LOVE. In the opinion of this creator of knowledge, in the hard, earthly creative environment, this triad under creative consideration should be arranged in the order as it was specified by him, and then the inter-relations of this dialectical triad should be dialectically synthesised in time DIA space, understood in the sense of distinguishing good from evil, that is, choosing better, less bad creative paths and ways from the multitude available and creatively accessible ones in this particular case when it comes to creating new knowledge or deepening existing knowledge. Keep in mind, from the point of view of this implemented methodological approach (dialectic interactive approach), this distinction between good and evil, accordingly distinguishing right from wrong, is more important than any other dialectical content considered, even if the word goes about such buzzy-notions such as in this particular case: truth, trust and love. As will be explained later, none of these considered concept-notions, as well as any other concept-notion, can be relied on during (creative) orientation and navigation in time and space, seen from a long-term perspective, especially from a dialectical long-run perspective of understanding the time and space, where everything is exposed to (dialectical) changes and influences. Remember, the only unsolved bipolar dilemma, which was retained and included in this methodological approach is distinguishing good from evil, but understood in terms of the implementation of the main method of the dialectical interactive approach: thesis, antithesis, synthesis DIA renewed thesis, amended antithesis... until the temporary conclusion was achieved.

As it will be later shown, exactly the lack of the clear, unbiased, undisputed, and impartial way and method for the distinction between good and evil is the main stumbling stone, as well as the main cause of the related disagreements when making the right or proper decision, judgement, or coming to a sensible conclusion, which will satisfy all and everyone during the (creative) consideration of complex relations within the dialectical triad of TRUTH, TRUST and LOVE in a particular social and cultural context. Especially, this is true when the final creative result [.... a multitude of renewed thesis until a temporary conclusion was achieved] from the point of view of common sense is considered. Either way, seen from this dialectical perspective, separately considering each of these concepts, understood in terms of the rectilinear bi-polar DIA binary way of thinking (binary value of the logical operation OR - OR: yes/no, black/white, love/truth, love/trust, truth/trust...) is not the appropriate way and methodic approach to deal with such a complex dialectical interactively creative contents. Particularly, when this subject under (creative) consideration was (in)seen from the perspective of the dialectical understanding of time and space, which has to be invested in the building of a personal relationship, even in the business sphere. You would LIKE

  • a business presentation DIA interpretation of the love, impressed in the medium of space (mind dia reason), and then expressed in terms of your emotively emotional dia physical presence(s) while trying to achieve this objective,
  • In modern natiocratic societies where everything revolves around money, as well as everything can be expressed in money, even bought for money, the concept - love has not been spared from these social influences and currents. The result of these modern social trends and influences expressed by the modern slogan "Socializing is socializing, but business is business" are marriage contracts, which seek to separate and define the boundaries between this modern form of love and personal material and financial interests.
  • This creator of knowledge does not intend to dispute the statements of spouses that this marital union and partnership is also based on love, nor to criticize this type of marriage partnership, but to point out the fact that love can be short-lived, that is, this modern product of incorporated love has a shelf life that depends on the quality of its built-in "ingredients". Or expressed this in terms of the applied methodological approach to solving the perceived challenge in time and space, partners faced with the TRUTH are forced to calculate (in the form of risk) the lack of mutual TRUST in this modern way of manifesting a marriage partnership [note: NOT the lack of LOVE, which is in abundance at this moment of time and the appropriate space, according to these lovebirds], that is, building and maintaining this kind of established interpersonal relationship and partnership has additional costs.
  • This expressed interdependence among the selected dialects of the applied triad (truth, trust, love) clearly shows that valid and proper concepts - notions were chosen for solving the perceived creative challenge in time and space.
  • For exercise, replace dialect - trust with the dialect - control, motivated by modern slogan: trust is a good concept, but control is an even better concept, which is especially relevant in the business and work environment as a result of lack of trust, self-control and self - responsibility. Is your creative result different? I hope so.

understood in terms of the potential gain from an established business relationship between two actors [business meaning of the notion-LOVE], that is, to earn some money, understood in the sense of some kind of mutual satisfaction and realization of involved business interests. In short, to be realized this business goal, the related distances between and among constituent dialects of the considered triad of TRUTH, TRUST, and LOVE should be overcome in one or another way, by (re)considering this dialectical interactive content from the viewpoint of the (available dia creatively accessible) time [Future, Emotively Emotional Presence dia your necessary Active Physical Presence, Past] DIA your shared space [Spirit, Mind dia Reason, Matter]. Like in the everyday scenario in time DIA the appropriate situation in space, someone has to make the first step to be initiated appropriate dia-process of overcoming these interrelated distances between the dialects-truth, trust, love.

By using this methodological approach, other key-notions and concepts can be (re)considered by arranging, classifying, and clustering them in triads according to their shared qualities or characteristics. For example, the very popular buzz-notions, which were debated in the antique Age by great Greek thinkers and philosophers, could be reconsidered by reflecting them through the prism of this dialectic interactive approach. The dialectical content of corresponding triads could be expanded by incorporating more akin notions: six (6) dialects - six-pointed star, 8 - eight-pointed star, 12 - twelve-pointed star.... or 5 - five-pointed star or any other manifestation of the star. But there is a catch because at the very end you have to synthesize this expanded dialectical content, understood in terms of your (temporary) conclusion of the subject under creative consideration. And as more dialects were included as more complex and difficult is to dialectically synthesize this dialectical content. In other words, the greater bandwidth of thoughts, feelings, and information and the related mentally emotional capacity and faculty is required to deal with this expanded dialectical interactively-creative content.

  an ancient conception of the triad of truth, trust, and love

Love Interpreted in terms of the Unity of Dialectical Triad through the prism of the Four Ancient Elements: Fire, Water, Air, Earth

The Unity and Struggle of Dialectical Contradictions in Time DIA Space


The Four Primary DIA Proto Paradigmatic Presumptions of the Dialectic Interactive Approach

How can this be done by implementing the dialectic methodological interactive approach? Simply by applying The Four Primary DIA Proto Paradigmatic Methodological Presumptions of the Dialectic Interactive Approach in the life reality: Fire, Water, Air, Earth. In other words, to the dialectical triad of truth, trust, love should be assigned the most suitable symbolic element: Fire, Water, Air, and then, this dialectical creative content should be placed in a particular (earthly) scenario in time DIA the appropriate situation in space [which is, for this reason, symbolized by the element - EARTH]. As this creative challenge of the considered time DIA space had been already thoroughly elaborated in the creative age of the rule of thinking and reasoning in terms of the implementation of these ancient four elements for solving various creative challenges, the symbolic attributes of the dialectical triad of truth, trust, love are known to me. In short, because dealing with the topic of TRUTH is a very "hot" thema and problematic ("playing with the fire"), the notion - truth was symbolically associated with the element - fire. On the other hand, the notion - love in the ancient hidden knowledge was considered as something vague, foggy, airily, heavenly, and for this reason, was associated with the element - air.

Finally, the notion - trust, as a mediator between these two often contradicted world of dialectics [of the dialectical interplay between truth and love, respectively, between their symbolical representation with the elements - fire and air], was symbolically associated with the element - water: evaporating when exposed to the element fire (sun or heat, for example, some manifestation of jealousy, financial disagreements....) and then falling down when longer exposed to the element air (by cooling it, for example, "honeymoon is over"). Or said this in a philosophical way: Thy trust (WATER) is a messenger between the truth (FIRE) and love (AIR). Because neither of these elements is firm but rather insubstantial, unstable, and changeable, a solid element (EARTH) is needed in order to put, test, and verify this complex dialectical creatively-interactive triad in a particular (earthly) scenario in time DIA the appropriate situation in space during the intermediating with mutual trust between these two very interactive realms of facing the truth with the love. Or this dialectical interplay expressed in another way, while hovering in the kingdom of love, truth, and trust, the landing (down on the Earth) is as necessary as it is inevitable from time to time, to verify in the earthly sense these complex relations of the dialectical triad of truth, trust, and love.

From the aforementioned, it is easy to conclude that in an earthly social environment, dealing with issues of the truth is the most difficult and controversial of all dialects of this dialectical triad. In short, the dialect-truth because of its divine origin and understanding (absolute truth) is the most misinterpreted, misused, and abused dialect of this triad. In other words, such an understanding of the role of (absolute) truth is usurped and discredited by numerous earthly gods [various manifestations of dogmas], and for this reason, became an almost useless concept; but still, a very important concept because this is a postulate, lever, and symbol of the earthly power and might. As a consequence of this, almost everyone attempts to tear off and to appropriate a piece of this misused or abused vastness of the earthly understanding of truth [as well as the role and meaning of the truth in this dialectical triad]. For this reason, this creator of knowledge during the initiated creative dia-processes (of creating knowledge), in full agreement with the dialectic interactive approach, uses the conception of the temporary conclusion as an earthly substitute for the unachievable divine truth [absolute truth is in the hands of God], that is, the undisputed or the agreed creative upshot of a creative discussion or debate. In other words, this dialectical (earthly but humane) understanding of the concept-truth is only valid until a better interpretation of the subject under creative (re-)consideration appeared on these endless creative expanses of the encompassed span of time DIA the creatively considered scope of space (spirit, mind dia reason, matter). On the other hand, love is heavenly and universal, and for this reason, everyone needs love (as well as to love someone). To hold them together, as well as for continual maintenance of these very complex relations of the dialectical interplay of truth and love, trust is necessary, both in an earthly and heavenly environment. Now, after all aforementioned, try to apply this ancient methodological approach in the living reality, and then compare thy creative result with the everyday binary (one-sided "OR") comprehension of the truth OR trust OR love:

  • Truth is the most important thing in a partnership.
  • No, love is the key!
  • What then is the role of trust in this black-white understanding of this established personal relationship to the constituent dialects of this considered triad? .....

Can this problem, that is, the creative challenge, be solved by combining them into pairs in a dual sense (AND - AND) by applying various types of duplicitous behavior of a simple-minded person (double-dealing and hypocrisy)?

  • Although there are many ways of manifesting hypocrisy in life and social reality, special attention will be directed here to the two-faced manifestation of love, because this is a topic that is creatively considered in this creative article. Unfortunately, this hypocritical way of expressing love was and remains very present in all natiocratic societies, including their established communities, formed groups and interest groups, collectives, and even families. For this reason, this type of manifestation of hypocrisy represents the glue that holds, and cements the established social relations within the formed collective and group entities, that is, maintains the established natiocratic societies, and in this way also their essence: natiocratism.
  • Within the family, this manifests itself when one or both parents try to push their offspring to the highest possible position on the social ladder using all available means including unethical ones [some of them do this not only from the first grade of primary school but from a very early age]. This form of expressing love for one's children, conceived within the family, continues to spread like a contagion within the framework of established kinship ties (nepotism) and friendships (cronyism), and from here it is not a long way to clientelism, as well as other natiocratic ways of awarding or buying and selling various undeserved privileges and positions in society, both at all levels of social organization and in all areas of human activity.
  • The peak of this way of showing hypocrisy is not only showing hypocrisy and multiple personalities but the fact when they [the losers of this type of natiocratic game of "chance" out of jealousy?] start complaining to each other about various forms of showing injustice in society, while neglecting and forgetting their personal, family, or kindred contribution to this malignant disease of all established natiocratic societies.
  • Here, the focus of these hypocritical unethical behaviors is the family, precisely because the postulates of every healthy family are the mutual cooperation of the dialects of this considered triad: truth, trust, love. At the same time, it is wanted to point out how difficult it is to establish and maintain a family within the wider established natiocratic communities, collectives, and societies and appropriate established social relations and "things" within them, especially due to additional (negative) international and global influences.
  • For all these previously mentioned reasons, this creator of knowledge could not leave out this form of manifestation of love in the established natiocratic societies around the world regardless of these contained unethical and immoral incentives. After all, in the introductory part of this creative article, it was already emphasized that "love is a very complex concept", and for that reason, it cannot be denied to the supporters of this type of very widespread (simple-minded) expression of love that this is in fact not an expression love.
  • From the point of view of the dialectical interactive approach considered, a better solution is to ask whether this will pass through the very narrow sieve of distinguishing Good from evil, which again largely depends on the purity of thy inner dia innermost being, and the subjective opinion based on it. As a result of this, a large number of people cannot clearly recognize whether they have crossed the line that separates Good from evil, that is, whether they will feel or not, the feeling of guilty conscience (pangs of conscience) familiar to every human being.
  • This creator of knowledge also hopes that now you are at least better acquainted with the secrets of the longevity of natiocracy, that is, with the futile (utopian) attempts and stubborn efforts to change the essence of natiocratic societies with various ideological (political) means for intoxication or blinding the broad masses of people, which are themselves deeply involved and entangled in its creation and maintenance.
  • To cut this long story short, the solution is again found within each of you (within thee), accordingly, collectively expressed within you, that is, within the established social community. For this reason, always begin the cultivation of good within thy own kingdom, for only there thou (potentially) have full control, as well as within the established family as far as it is practicable, and so on spreading the light of good wherever it is feasible, without wasting it unnecessarily to incurable cases.
  • In other words, free thyself from the restraints and extremism of the two-polar way of thinking: OR everything OR nothing, OR 100% OR 0%, and similar, whose ultimate purpose is to discourage people, that is, to facilitate the implementation of various natiocratic ways of favoring evil, the result of which is obtained the impression (self-deception) that it pays more to be evil than good. Regardless of all this, every human-loving being will feel good in any established social community where Good prevails, and extremes are not destined for human being anyway.

From this, it can be concluded that even managing and solving all the creative challenges of this triad with the previously elaborated tripling them in terms of the afore-elaborated way and method - three (3 - the triad of three dialects) DIA one (1 dialect) is also a very tricky business. What is thy opinion?

a case for thinking

  • Since your earliest childhood and youth, your closest friends were a girl and a boy, with whom you spent a lot of time together, sharing both good and bad moments, which considerably contributed to building mutual trust among the three of you. You were an inseparable band of three people, who shared the same value system and interests. When they later married, you were their best friend. They got three children, and after your marriage, you have continued your friendship, and there were no secrets between you. Unfortunately, by chance, you were the witness of a love affair (adultery) of one of your friends (choose which one of them) with a fellow-worker [because (s)he was drunk, for example].
  • What would you do in such a scenario in time DIA this unexpected situation in space (spirit, mind dia reason, matter). Reconsider carefully each possible scenario in time DIA this particular situation in space in different social and CULTURAL contexts by implementing the afore-elaborated triad of the truth, trust, and love reflecting it through the prism of four ancient elements: fire, water, air DIA earth [the act of cheating is under creative consideration: adultery]?
  • Do you think, it is worth to sacrifice mutual trust and love, built over so many years, on the behalf and name of truth, but at the expense of losing at least one of your friends, or both of them, including the scenario of divorce, or quarreling, beating, or even murdering....?
  • Reconsider your made decision by reflecting it this time through the prism of distinguishing good from evil, in the way you make the distinction between good and bad, or evil if you so please. Then re-consider your made decision in the sense, whether this will bring more good or evil as a consequence of your decision?
  • Have you considered the future fate of their children (your god-children) in the case of divorce as well as other possible scenarios in time DIA the appropriate situation in space? Do you think that you had inflicted harm (or committed evil) to your god-children by your made decision, understood in terms of the well-known human prick of conscience, because they lost a parent, especially, if they blame you for it, and never forgive you?
  • Do you think that due to your close friendship you have the right to intervene in the personal relations of a married couple?
  • You can also put this dialectical content in a broader social context by comparing this bad act or committed evil, if you so will be said ("ant bite"), to the even greater committed evil all around of you including killing (world-wide), which perhaps can also influence and affect your final made decision.
  • Keep in mind, all this aforementioned was considered from the earthly standpoint of distinguishing good from evil. On the other hand, the tasting various bitter fruits of the after-life VERSUS enjoying the sweetness of the heavenly fruits is not in the jurisdiction of earthly authorities and tribunals (based on their power and might) but rather in thy hands [avoid committing evil (to others)] DIA heavenly judgement and verdict of that.

Do you still think, the complex inter-relations between the truth, trust, and love in a particular earthly (social, cultural,...) context is easy to handle, followed by making the right decision regardless of which methodical approach was used and applied by you? Especially, when this dialectical content was considered in different cultural dia the appropriate religious contexts and environments. In my opinion, during the distinction of good from evil, each human and humane being avoids to commit evil, on the first place, to harm other good persons, and then her-, himself, as well as with her-, his actions and made decisions, (s)he endeavours to reduce (not to increase) the level of committed evil and inflicted harms in the societal environment and the world-wide as well. In short, evil, bad, and harm is everything you commit and inflict (pain and harm) to others, but which you personally do not want that they do to you. Here, the very important is to pay attention to the committed evil to other good persons. Either way, this ancient methodological approach was re-introduced from oblivion by bringing its methodological postulates, methodical procedures, and techniques to the light of day, which, to my opinion, can much better deal with challenges of the social and living reality. Or at least, much better to identify, explain and elaborate creative challenges of the dialectical content under (creative) consideration than the existing dual (AND-AND) → bipolar (OR-OR) dia binary (OR) methodological approaches.

Now READ the Next Part: