These events coincided with the information technology and communication revolution, which additionally facilitated the transformation and fusion of the international markets into a global market (Global Village), especially this contributed to the emergence of global financial markets. These forces of globalization added extra fuel to the rise of popularity of neoliberalism, which triggered further deregulation of labor markets and financial markets, the marketization of national social institutions and agencies, and the regulation of global trade in goods and services between national states by the establishment of the World Trade Organization (1995). This marketization of social institutions and agencies is characterized by trade and sales of the misfortune of the wretched unemployed [financially dependent clients and helpless patients for additional milking tax-payers' money] to private providers of services of various courses using the brokerage services of precisely these social institutions and other government agencies [ social market economy ].

Although this is presented as helping these unfortunates to get a job faster, in this artificially created social ambience of a societal reality beyond the scope of normal human understanding, it is in fact a purposefully intended and deliberated interplay of various parasites and social, economic, and political intrigantes for their own gain within this created social labor market. These negative trends in interaction with no more need for the social welfare institutions because this form of the regulation of social ambience and market fulfilled its role in the fall of traditional communism, gave rise to accelerated privatization of public services such as healthcare, social housing, education and the like. Actually, only the bureaucratic (and social security) structure of the social welfare state survived and was transformed into some kind of social police and worker's police to cope with this new situation in the resulting societal ambience of this natiocratic interaction between the social market and the labor market ( social market economy ), whose budgetary implications are absorbed with the continuously growing role of the flexible labor market.

On the one hand, privatization of state companies in the economically and financially conquered ex-communistic countries resulted that the destiny of their workers was simply handed over to foreign corporations of this invisible global state. In most cases, this kind of (foreign) investment ended with the sale of property acquired with previous generations [most retirees were brought to the begging stick] and the closure of these enterprises acquired in this corporate manner, which was imitated by the newly forming domestic (corporate) elite: the turbo-richmen,

• without having previously prepared, empowered and trained their workers and other future "owners" nor learned them how this way of organizing business works, as well as starting this way of privatization without sufficiently developed financial markets and other mechanisms for its smooth functioning [including laymen-brokers and organizers of this stock exchange] in cooperation with domestic legislative and executive privatizers.
• All this reminds me of the foreign imposition of this natiocratic democracy, even in countries where the majority of the population can neither read nor write except to guess, and then to round out ballot, and in this manner to participate in the struggle for the distribution of awards of this kind of natiocratic democratic lotteries.
• And what to say about the achieved level of development of citizens' awareness and conscience in the role of voters as a precondition for a democratic way of political organization to function in a humane way worthy of a human being, respectively whether this necessary condition is met and fulfilled in the most developed countries, which practice this modern naciocratic manifestation of democracy?

that is, the abolition of jobs [competition decrease to their goods and services too] and transfer of the fate of these ex-workers back into the hands of their national state [social market economy presented above]. Just pay attention to this kind of interplay between the faceless free (global) market and the national state, respectively between neoliberalism and this established social market economy. This interplay of neoliberalism, the social market economy, and globalization is known as globalism. On the other hand, in countries of the source of these foreign direct investments (FDI), the aforementioned led to the outflow of capital as well as to the decrease of the available working places there too, as a result of this relocation of production capacities and services. In short, although ITC revolution created lots of new better-paid jobs, the transition and transformation of the obsolete qualifications required even larger investments, which were unavailable as a result of this outflow of capital worldwide.

Either way, as end result of this privatization and global foreign direct investments, instead of contributions to the public budget of countries of the origin of FDI, as well as to the public budget of the recipient countries of these foreign direct investments, corporate shareholders and private companies have been richly rewarded. Furthermore, their taxes have been cut globally, regulation reduced, and other stimulative incentives are granted including also subventions to assist their business, that is, not to close the factory or not to lay off workers (extortion of taxpayers' money) while these formed holes in the public budget were filling with the increased taxation of citizens as well as by increasing internal (and external) debt. In short, at the beginning of the 21st century, it seemed, nothing can stop the ascent of this global neoliberalism.

the decline of neoliberalism

And then came the economic and financial collapse in 2008. Although I tackled some very important issues of the facelessness of market, and the shareholders way of organizing corporations including its postulates of financial markets too in my Ph.D. proposal (1999) and masters' thesis (1997) as well as introduced the concept of debt economy dia economy of debtors ( debtism ) at the beginning of 21st century, there are still many open questions, why the hidden masters of this global state made decision to empty the accumulated cream in the global financial markets? In my opinion, they could handle the issues and challenges of this financial crisis for at least the next 20 years [jubilee of the Great Depression] by pouring this financial fog from the hollow into the created void of this global market. An explanation might be their estimation that they have been already very well networked and structured (to fail), so the state will be compelled to compensate for their losses and later to further reward them as well, or there were some insurmountable disagreements within their invisible global state. Anyway, they for sure overestimated the power of their virtual global state compared to the power of real national states, especially by impoverishing the broad masses in their own countries which further strengthened national right-wing and left-wing movements, that is, they forgot that even they cannot so simply cross over these firmly established boundaries of natiocratism [by creating a kind of globalcratism].

In short, in full agreement with the postulates of neoliberalism, these impoverished masses cannot follow these uncertain paths of free movement of capital, goods, and services at the global level because this was not a part of their neoliberal program, and for this reason, their survival and their families depend on the welfare and survival of their national states. In other words, their global activities like a boomerang changed the national democratic ambience and mood of these voters, and politicians as well, who always bend to the side where the wind blows. To stay in power, they simply adjusted their political programs to this new national democratic (right-wing versus left-wing) reality to absorb, make blunt, control, channel, redirect, and guide political intentions of these unpredictable masses in their desired direction. To this should be added that almost all worth privatizing globally have already been privatized in the way explained above, which also contributed to a shift in the inclination of the hidden masters of this established economic and financial order towards globalization.

Either way, their seemingly reasonable explanation put forward to blame for the economic collapse in the 2008s the deregulation of financial markets and the lack of scrutiny of financial institutions is not entirely satisfactory because none can regulate and control the still divided global markets by different national interests. In addition to this, there is still a lot of unknown in the way, how the efficiency of financial markets works at the global level. For this reason, a better approach is to still see this global village as an intertwined and tangled ball without a visible clue in it. In any case, no one can better understand these global trends than the ubiquitous noses, eyes, and ears of this invisible global state which continues to influence these real developments in the global market by working and acting in the background of these global events. Regardless of all this, as a result of this economic and financial collapse in the 2008s, against these forces of global integration and globalism in general, the role of the nation was re-examined and reaffirmed allegiance to the national state, and the forgotten protectionism when deemed in the protection of higher national interests was called for help. It is worth emphasizing here that the various protectionist trade barriers for free access to national markets were present and implemented during the entire period of neoliberalism.

The age of debtism

Concluding this era of the rule of neoliberalism and its last stage of development known as globalism, this grand social, economic, and financial experiment for testing the claim that free markets really do work best of all known mechanisms and regulators of economic and financial flows as well as able to regulate themselves (at the global level too), experienced the similar fate as its predecessor (classical laissez-fair liberalism), that is, failed as a consequence of another Big economic and financial crunch in the year 2008. Moreover, this type of liberalism was replaced again with the increased state intervention and regulation of the financial sector and market, this time at the global level. In short, using tax-payers' money, the banks' debts were taken over and recapitalized without the right of ownership (B shares), and thus renounced its future participation in profit sharing. The rest of it was placed in the special containers for keeping this kind of 'radioactive waste', while approved cheap loans and guaranties enabled in this way the transfer of market risk to the (national) state.

In other words, the state was reduced to a cheap helping hand and subservient serfage of these too big national and global players, which were too well structured into this purposefully created national and global network by them to fail, that is, to be punished in accordance with the basic principle of this 'faceless free' market of neoliberalism. As a result of this, it seems, this visible auxiliary hand of the state is more useful in this unfavorable social, economic, and financial scenario in time and the appropriate situation in space than the invisible hand of the impersonal free market. In other words, the invisible hand of the faceless free market is more desirable when the business is going well or flourishing while this visible auxiliary hand of the state is preferred and welcome in difficult times for the hidden masters of this global state, that is when the time came to pay the full price for their business market risk. Or it is again a matter of the magical interplay of the faceless free market and accumulated darkness of debts in national states and financial bubbles in the global financial market when this hidden darkness is illuminated for a short period of time during the transformation of this invisible hand of the impersonal market into the visible auxiliary hand of the state by this wizard unmasking with his magic wand some of the partakers in this global business game to emerge from this facelessness of the free market and to stand under the public spotlight of these theatrical stages and appropriate acts in this artistic performance of an economy driven globally by this interaction of a continuous increase in debt and the misuse of taxpayers' money ( debtism ).

Implications of this latest state regulation and intervention at the global level are numerous. For example, interventions of the reformed and reconstructed government agencies and services (social police), adapted to the principles of this newly established social market economy, penetrated deeply into all spheres of private and family life, supporting wide-spread practices of social exclusion of undesirable groups and intruders, especially those who disagree with them or have different opinion and view of this established economic and social order, outsourcing state institutions and social services at the mercy of the raw social "free" market in interaction with the further flexibility of labor market, austerity at the expense of impoverished lower natiocratic castes, as well as attempts to cut even further government spending on social programs over previously widely accepted social rights on a piece of bread for everyone without reducing the number of employees and bureaucrats in the social sector. To this should be added, further discrimination of vulnerable groups of people for purpose of segregation and social apartheid of them to form additional natiocratic castes [natiocratic outcast: the social waste] according to race, nationality, citizenship, ethnicity, religion, age, and other forms of social differentiation and segregation from the privileged natiocratic castes, especially on the 'flexibil' labor market.

debtism as an interplay of a faceless free market and state regulation and intervention

Despite the marginalization of neoliberal ideas, on the TV, newspapers as well as during the large left and right-wing gatherings and demonstrations, the word still goes about neoliberalism, or about the resurrection of neoliberalism, although opposite processes were initiated: regulation of capital and financial markets, public ownership of banks, increasing trade barriers and protectionism, as well as the increased influence of state and network structures in the global economy in general. In other words, although many view neoliberalism as the main culprit for this failure of neoliberal market self-regulation, they actually failed to notice this previously explained interplay of the basic ideas of the faceless free market and state regulation and intervention [ in interaction with this crippled social market economy ]. Or put it in another way, if it really was the case, in full compliance with neoliberal ideas of the self-regulation of the free market, this would result in the collapse of many of the international banks because laws of the free market ruled and made such a judgment. For sure, if there was no feasibility of intervention of the state, that is, of the interplay of these twins: offspring, mechanisms, and regulators of the natiocratism.

Theoretically too, as an alternative, instead of taking over their debts and market risk using tax-payers' money, as well as further borrowing and other ways to increase debts, or selling license rights, governments of the most economically developed and militarily powerful countries could invest these financial resources to create publicly owned companies. But practically due to shortcomings of the natiocratic democracy (limited political mandate, for example), there is no guaranty that these publicly-owned companies will not be privatized later by an opposition parties' government

• [strengthening and supporting their financial and political position in this way (THESIS).
• For this reason, in full compliance with this form of the political natiocracy, during the process of the privatization of public companies and services, the appropriate option is a continuation of the privatization of public asset as much as feasible and workable to undermine the economic, financial, and political position of political party opponents (ANTITHESIS)
• until nothing is remained to privatize (SYNTHESIS), which will unite with this final act all political parties ideologically at the national level (THE RENEWED THESIS) to search for new such business opportunities of privatization globally (THE RENEWED ANTITHESIS), and so on in time and space until everything is privatized at this global level (TEMPORARY CONCLUSION).
• In the case, new business opportunities of privatization are emerged somewhere in the solar system or in the accessible universe (THE RENEWED DIALECTICAL ANTITHESIS), then the currently achieved temporary conclusion is no more valid [transformed in THE RENEWED DIALECTICAL THESIS] because this already ex-temporary conclusion is challenged by this new business opportunity of the privatization of public companies and services (DIALECTICAL SYNTHESIS). And as a result of this, a new cycle of this main dialectic method has already started from the beginning.
• I hope you now know what the next step is in this well-known natiocratic societal universe as well as by using this main dialectic method to present the opposite way of natiocratic thinking regarding this bipolar transition and transformation of this black-white scenario in time and the appropriate situation in space until its final binary outcome is achieved: black or white.]

As a result of this, in the political systems of natiocratic democracy, short-term social, political, ecological, economic, and financial incentives will always prevail, which is in fact one of the reasons for the alternating coronation of these twins of natiocracy (faceless market and state) for a limited period of time: until the next great economic and financial crisis. In other words, this kind of transfer of the political power and economic and financial decision making to the will of the faceless free market as a mask will at the end only cause the state regulation and intervention to save losers of this 'impersonal' market and vice versa because even this long-term periodic interaction and cooperation of the state and free-market contributes to the continuation of the functioning of natiocratic democracy: quite a certain change or adjustement of the political direction as a result of strengthening the right and left political wings (political power redistribution). In full agreement with the previous thoroughly elaborated natiocratic white versus the black view of the world around them [private or public, in this particular case] thoroughly elaborated above, to make up for this shortcoming of the natiocratic democracy to maintain dominance in global markets, they are ideologically against organizing companies in some other way, the result of which is the prevention of competition of different property forms at a global level. More about this will be said later. Keep in mind, all natiocratic economic and social orders are actually against the idea of competition, and for this reason, this economic way of making war was only used as a last resort because this kind of making war is also very expensive.

The Natiocratic Pyramid

No doubt, this ideological confrontation of the property forms leads to a conflict and confrontation of these different interests at all levels, a scenario in time and the appropriate situation in this global space that has already taken place during the Cold War period. Pay again attention to this repetition of what has already been seen: a return to the past spending my, thy, our future. Either way, the debtism has reversed or undermined nearly every aspect of classical capitalism, from the change of the trigger and ruler of this economy [capital ⇢ cash ⇢ debt], progressive taxation at the expense of citizens, the gap widening in the treatment of companies and citizens, welfare distribution, and non-market incentives by rewarding its losers, to the segregation of unemployed and workers in natiocratic castes, and as a consequence of this, to the social and economic segregation (and discrimination) of their children too. In short, the mixed economy of public and private companies was dismantled by natiocratic elites with huge help of the state structures, who adjusted and revised rules of a potentially efficient and transparent market economy (free market with recognizable faces) for their own benefit, that is, in favor of a global financial elite, enacting and legally adopting self-serving economic, financial, and social policies (and selecting the appropriate politicians) which is in full compliance with natiocratic democracy, what actually allowed them to get rich.

start-ups - entrepreneurship based on the humane, creatively individual way of thinking

Seen from the perspective of human, individual way of thinking, the afore-interpreted black versus the white view of the world of organizing natiocratism, understood also in terms of the competition of different property forms, is much more complex. In short, even if these ideological disagreements were solved, that is, the mixed economy was reintroduced and tolerated, there are lots of other unsolved issues for a successful running this economy. Firstly, the issue of the privatization of these companies has to be solved in a constitutional way [putting this in the constitution preamble], supported by an independent public board for entrepreneurship [not by political parties for reasons previously discussed]

• [the most capable and competent experts in the whole country as well as the best individuals capable to distinguish Good from less good choices, and to smell and feel the success of the chosen entrepreneurship too: profit]

similar to a central bank to also oversee privatization issues of a public start-up company, as well as to regulate the height of the minimal percentage of shareholder votes to be accepted the referendum decision on its privatization [the best practices reconsidered and updated on a yearly basis], for some justified reasons or due to the agreed interests of its shareholders. The final percentage of shareholders in order to approve privatization has to be regulated by the start-up company statute.

As the role of creative abilities is highly valued in any entrepreneurship, especially in this one, the business ideas have to be adequately paid by the shares issued. In short, these key-actors are rewarded by the most shares, and these extra rewarding shares unlike other stocks are only valid while making a profit otherwise they are annulled. In other words, each knowledge creator should continue to create new cost-effective business ideas, or someone else should be recruited who can lay a new golden egg because for the long-term survival of such an established company the continual creation of new knowledge is crucial. To be further discouraged public listing this business venture on financial markets, the issued shares must be of an internal nature, that is, valid internally and until the employee leaves the company, for one or another reason. After every few years of working for the company, the new shares are issued at the end of the year, but only if the profit was made in this period as well as not too many new shares issued because the future is more important than the past (living from the old glory) to attract easier new talents with the appropriate skills and qualifications. Because creative persons are a rarity [the most precious jewels of the entrepreneurship] and for this reason, they are the best rewarded until lay golden eggs, they are very rarely good managers [that's why lots of initially very successful start-up companies failed after a few years of business success]. Apart from this, why would they waste their so rare talent and appropriate creativity (gift of God) doing (boring for them) managerial jobs?

In other words, the next step is the selection of top management. Instead of board directors, a local or regional independent public board for entrepreneurship is founded as a place to learn these skills, in addition to providing adequate professional and advisory services, that is, whose members later to be promoted to the central public body because some of its members will sooner or later try something else [a new business, social or political profession]. The start-up companies have to outsource accounting, finance, statistics and analytics departments and the like to their local or regional independent public body for entrepreneurship, which will organize these services under a local or regional umbrella, to be prevented fabrication of appropriate reports (false or fake reports), to reduce business management costs as well as to enable the top management to concentrate on key business management issues. However, start-up companies will have on-line access to these reports on an ongoing basis as well as receive helpful advice from this local or regional public body for entrepreneurship. In the final step, after the business plan was made and approved, key-personal in the production or service department is recruited, as well as other employees of this start-up company. Each of them also should be chosen individually by the teamwork of the business idea creators and top management including the advisory role of the local or regional independent public body for entrepreneurship as well.

This way of establishing a start-up company is very similar to establishing a virtual company, which is gathered around a temporary project. For this reason, the virtual way of organizing a company can be used for testing the aforementioned business ideas to reduce the market risk of failure of starting a company. Or put it in another way, only after several successfully completed projects on a temporary basis (virtual company), a start-up company should be approved and set up. Since central, regional, and local public body for entrepreneurship has a Great Picture and insight into the creative and management abilities of all available talents with special skills (central database), they can centrally, regionally and locally regroup gathering the best of them in teams for creating these start-up companies. The organizational structure should be very flat to cut the costs of floor-management. In other words, all employees should mindually and spiritually be self-empowered to be able to self-control themselves and to become SELF-RESPONSIBLE for assigned tasks in order to be decreased in that way a need for direct supervision of them. To cut this story short, a CONTINUAL increasing level of the achieved development of consciousness of the employees of a start-up company, manifested by the recognizable human bites of the CONSCIENCE for not doing a good job, is of essential importance in this way of organizing business. Only in this way the desirable two-way up-down self-promotion, based on its demonstrated abilities during the execution of assigned tasks, enables successful teamwork as well as start-up company success as a whole. The best and always the best for a particular task should be promoted to be leaders of the week, month... year during business project implementation.

In this mode of setting up start-up companies, the national, regional, local government, or a trust fund provides the necessary funding, which is gradually redistributed in shares to its employees, of which the largest number of shares belong to the creators of business ideas. In case of a successful business start-up, dividends realized on the basis of public shares will go to the fund for starting new business ventures under the supervision of the aforementioned public boards for entrepreneurship. Keep in mind, a too high public stake in equity of the start-up company will reduce incentives to retain existing key-employees as well as to attract new talents. Due to the relatively low level of achieved development of consciousness and conscience in general, this way of organizing start-up companies and new business ventures is suitable for setting up small companies [and later for their gradual transition and transformation in the medium-size companies].

Read the Next Part: final thoughts